ETH 2017-01
Ethics Advisory Panel Op. 2017-01
Rhode Island Ethics Opinions
Rhode Island Supreme Court
February 13, 2017
FINAL
FACTS:
Two
inquiring attorneys have requested the Ethics Advisory
Panel’s guidance concerning the propriety of providing
legal services relating to Rhode Island’s medical
marijuana law. The attorneys propose to provide legal
services to individuals and businesses that seek assistance
in obtaining licenses to cultivate, dispense, or supply
medical marijuana. They also propose to assist clients in
establishing medical-marijuana related businesses. The
attorneys ask whether they may advise and assist clients who
plan to engage in activities that are permitted under the
Rhode Island medical marijuana laws, but which are illegal
activities under federal law.
ISSUE
PRESENTED:
May the
inquiring attorneys provide legal services relating to Rhode
Island’s medical marijuana law when conduct that is
permitted under the law is unlawful under federal law?
OPINION:
The
inquiring attorneys may ethically advise clients about Rhode
Island’s medical marijuana law, and may ethically
represent, advise, and assist clients in all activities
relating to and in compliance with the law, provided that the
lawyers also advise clients regarding federal law, including
the federal Controlled Substances Act.
REASONING:
Medical
marijuana was legalized in Rhode Island in 2006 with the
enactment of “The Edward O. Hawkins and Thomas C.
Slater Medical Marijuana Act” (hereinafter, medical
marijuana law). See G.L. 1956 § 21-28.6-1
et.seq. The statute permits the cultivation, manufacture,
sale, distribution, possession, and use of medical marijuana.
The activities permitted under the law are subject to a
comprehensive regulatory scheme that requires oversight over
all aspects of the medical marijuana program while also
ensuring patient access and safety. See G.L. 1956
§ 21-28.6-2(8). Under federal law, however, pursuant to
the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), it
is unlawful to grow, manufacture, dispense or...