ETH 2019-03
Ethics Advisory Panel Op. 2019-03
Rhode Island Supreme Court
September 12, 2019
Final
FACTS
The
inquiring attorney asks whether he/she may participate in and
pay the fees charged by an internet service for lawyers. The
inquiring attorney states that the internet company offers to
forward leads to attorneys which may result in clients. The
company acquires leads through a website that asks consumers
who are seeking attorneys to fill out a questionnaire. The
company does not make any representations about the quality
of the referred attorney. The inquiring attorney states that
the company has an exclusive relationship with one attorney
in a jurisdiction in each field of practice. The internet
company forwards the consumer's information to the
affiliated attorney either by email or by a telephone
connection with the potential client. The attorney agrees to
pay the company a flat fee for each lead regardless of
whether the lead results in an attorney-client engagement,
and regardless of the amount of the resulting attorney's
fee.
ISSUE
PRESENTED
The
inquiring attorney asks whether the exclusive arrangement
with an internet company that will provide leads connecting
potential clients with him/her, and the charge per lead, are
permissible under the Rules of Professional Conduct.
OPPNION
The
internet company which holds itself out as a "Lawyer
Referral Service" is an impermissible for-profit lawyer
referral service.
REASONPNG
The
Panel has reviewed the pertinent websites. There are two. One
website is where a consumer may read articles on various
legal topics. The consumer may also either enter basic
identifying information on the website, including name and
zip code, or choose to call a toll-free telephone number to
connect to an attorney.
The
second website provides information for potential
participant-lawyers, including a list of areas of law and a
description of the arrangement between participating lawyers
and the company. This webpage is entitled 'Lawyer
Referral Service."
...