ETH 1175
Ethics Opinion 1175
New York Ethics Opinion
New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics
October 28, 2019
Topic:
Withdrawal of guilty plea; allocation of authority between
lawyer and client.
Digest:
Once a lawyer has explained the material risks and chances of
success of the withdrawal of a previously entered guilty plea
to a criminal defendant, the lawyer must follow the decision
of the client to withdraw the plea.
Rules:
1.2(a), 1.4, 3.1
FACTS
1. The
inquiring lawyer has been assigned as counsel to a criminal
defendant who, while represented by previous counsel, had
entered a guilty plea to a criminal charge with an
understanding of the sentence to be imposed. On the date set
for that sentencing, defendant did not appear and later was
re-arrested on two misdemeanor charges. The sentencing was
adjourned.
2. On
the new date set for sentencing, the defendant discharged his
prior attorney and advised the court that he wished to
withdraw his prior guilty plea. On that same date, the
inquirer was appointed by the court and the case adjourned to
allow the inquirer to bring a motion to withdraw
defendant's prior guilty plea.
3. The
inquirer has obtained a transcript of the plea proceedings
and interviewed prior counsel and finds nothing which would
support the contention that the plea was not knowingly and
voluntarily made. The inquirer is likewise convinced that the
evidence would result in a guilty verdict if the matter were
taken to trial and that if he withdraws his prior guilty plea
he will not be afforded a drug treatment program that was in
the previous plea agreement.
QUESTION
4. Is a
lawyer required to follow the client's decision to
withdraw a guilty plea when the consequences of such
withdrawal will result in a more severe sentencing of the
defendant and the motion has little chance of success?
DISCUSSION
5. Our jurisdiction is limited to interpreting the N.Y. Rules
of Professional Conduct (the “Rules”). It is our
understanding...