ETH 18-06
Ethics Advisory Opinion 18-06
South Carolina Bar Ethics Opinion
Ethics Advisory Opinion
November 12, 2018
The
Ethics Advisory Committee renders opinions exclusively to
members of the South Carolina Bar concerning ethical issues
raised by the inquirer's contemplated conduct not
relating to a pending matter. This Committee has no
disciplinary authority. Lawyer discipline in South Carolina
is administered solely by the South Carolina Supreme Court
through its Commission on Lawyer Conduct.
South
Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.7, 1.8,
5.4
Factual
Background:
The
Ethics Advisory Committee received two inquiries regarding
the propriety of associating with a financial brokerage
company. The Committee is addressing both inquiries in this
opinion because they concern the same legal issue. Lawyer or
law firm desires to offer legal services to individuals or
parties who are not able to afford the services. The cases
are not appropriate for contingent fee contracts. Therefore,
the lawyer would associate with a financial brokerage company
or other third-party financing vendor. The broker or vendor
would apply for financing for the client to pay the
attorney’s fee, and, if approved for financing, the
client would receive financing completely independently of
the lawyer or law firm. The broker or vendor charges an
initial setup fee, a monthly technology fee for maintaining
the payment web page and an administration fee. The lawyer
would also pay the vendor or broker a merchant fee, which
would be a percentage of the amount financed for the legal
fee. The loan service would be explained to clients as a
payment option along with any other options such as credit
cards, checks, cash, etc. The proceeds of the loan are paid
directly to the potential client by the lender. The client
then pays a fee to the lawyer in accordance with the relevant
fee agreement. The potential client is not required to hire
this particular lawyer or law firm, nor is the potential
client required to use the money for legal fees. The lawyer
or law firm is not responsible for repayment of the loan,
either directly or indirectly. The brokerage company or...