12-0003. BERNARD L. WAGNER Employee v. ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT Self-Insured Employer Defendant.
Court | Alaska |
Alaska Workers Compensation Decisions
2012.
Workers' Compensation Board
12-0003.
BERNARD L. WAGNER Employee v. ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT Self-Insured Employer Defendant
Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals
Commission BERNARD L. WAGNER,
Employee, Applicant, v. ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Self-Insured Employer,
Defendant.AWCBDecision
No. 12-0003Filed with AWCB Anchorage,
Alaskaon January 6, 2012AWCB Case No. 200701423FINAL DECISION AND
ORDERBernard Wagner's (Employee) claim for medical benefits was
heard on December 5, 2011. Chancy Croft represented Employee. David
Floerchinger represented Anchorage School District (Employer). The record
closed on December 7, 2011.
ISSUE
Employee contends he is entitled to future medical treatment
for his neck, shoulders, back, and mental conditions resulting from a January
22, 2007 work injury. Employer contends Employee's shoulder and back conditions
are unrelated to the work injury and Employee's neck and mental conditions
consisted of temporary aggravations of preexisting conditions, which have
resolved. Employee and Employer agree Employer has paid for Employee's
work-related medical treatment to date and the parties' dispute involves only
future medical care.
Is Employee entitled to future medical treatment for his
shoulders, neck, back and mental conditions?
FINDINGS OF
FACT
A review of the entire record and the parties' stipulation
establishes the following facts by a preponderance of the evidence:
1) On September 5, 1996, Employee underwent a cervical spine
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the impression was no disk herniations.
There was mild disk bulging at both C5-6 and C6-7 with foraminal spurring on
the left side at C5-6 and bilaterally, greater on the left, at C6-7.
(Stipulation of Facts at 1, December 5, 2011).
2) On January 24, 2004, Employee was injured while
cross-country skiing. Stacy Young, D.C., treated Employee on or around January
28, 2004, for a sprain/strain of the cervical and thoracic spine.
Id.
3) January 28, 2004 through March 25, 2004, Dr. Young treated
Employee at Healthwise Care Center and Physical Therapy for his skiing injury.
The assessment was cerviothoracic and right shoulder sprain/strain injury. Dr.
Young stated, "He suffers from posterior and inferior right shoulder capsule
tightness and weakness." Id.
4) On February 4, 2004, Employee reported to Dr. Young a
stressful work environment. Dr. Young wrote a letter to Employee's employer,
United States Postal Service (USPS), excusing Employee from work from January
28, 2004 through February 3, 2004, due to cervical and thoracic sprain/strain.
Id.
5) On February 10, 2004 and February 12, 2004, Employee
reported to Dr. Young he felt stress from work aggravated his back.
Id. at 2.
6) On February 20, 2004, Dr. Young wrote a letter to USPS,
excusing Employee from work that day due to spasm in the right trapezius,
levator scapulae and rhomboid musculature. Dr. Young also noted Employee
reported work was stressful. Id.
7) On February 23, 2004, Dr. Young treated Employee. Employee
reported less tightness, as well as his right shoulder felt good.
Id.
8) On February 25, 2004, Employee explained to Dr. Young why
Employee dropped off a Medical Status Report Form and Family and Medical Leave
Act (FMLA) Form. Employee also reported "difficult communication" with his
supervisor, and stated he had been released from work temporarily to seek
evaluation from a psychologist. Id.
9) On March 9, 2004, Employee continued to report his continued
tightness is primarily stress related, but treatment was helpful.
Id.
10) On March 18, 2004, Dr. Young signed the FMLA form left by
Employee. She stated Employee continued to be treated two times a week,
Employee reported the mental stress caused him to become tight and
uncomfortable in his neck and upper back and occasionally in his low back, and
the treatments helped relieve stress. Dr. Young anticipated three to five more
weeks of treatment. Id.
11) On March 25, 2004, Employee reported to Dr. Young he felt
he was recovered almost completely from his skiing injuries. He reported he
continued to feel discomfort in his neck and upper back due to stress but
stated it was related to his situation at work. Id.
12) On October 15, 2004, Patricia Skala, D.O., treated Employee
and noted back pain and intermittent migraines. She also noted a plan to refer
Employee to Jim Halfpenny. Id.
13) On October 19, 2004, James Halfpenny, PT, evaluated
Employee. Mr. Halfpenny noted Employee was unable to work, secondary to
dysfunction, Employee reported increased work stress about four months ago with
the onset of mid-back pain, and Employee recently tested for a new job, driving
a bus for the Anchorage School District (ASD) with onset of pain again. Mr.
Halfpenny recommended Employee attend rehabilitative therapy twice weekly for
four weeks. Id.
14) On October 29, 2004, Dr. Skala treated Employee for
cervical and thoracic back pain, migraines, as well as chronic nausea. Dr.
Skala noted a flat affect. Id.
15) Mr. Halfpenny treated Employee twice before Employee was
discharged. Employee reported feeling better on November 24, 2004, stating he
had started working for ASD driving a bus. Id.
16) On May 25, 2005, Dr. Skala treated Employee and assessed
Migraine Cephalgia. Id. at 3.
17) On June 1, 2005, Dr. Skala noted an improvement of
Employee's headaches as well as arthritis symptoms in his hands. X-rays were
ordered for neck pain. Id.
18) On June 3, 2005, Employee underwent a cervical spine series
of x-rays. The impression was degenerative disc disease with spur formation at
C5-C6 primarily, which was less prominent at C6-C7, and some onset of spurring
at C4 was noted as well. Id.
19) On June 20, 2005, Dr. Skala saw Employee for a follow up of
the x-rays. He assessed neck pain with radiculopathy. An MRI was ordered.
Id.
20) On June 22, 2005, Employee had an MRI of the cervical
spine. The impression was of a mild spinal stenosis secondary to posterior
spondylosis accompanied by a very small central disc protrusion at C5-6 and a
mild annular degeneration at C6-7. No significant foraminal stenosis was
identified. Id.
21) On August 2, 2005, Dr. Louis Kralick evaluated Employee and
noted Employee retired from the postal service about a year ago, and was
currently employed as a bus driver for tourist trips during the summer and for
the school district the rest of the year. Dr. Kralick did not feel it likely
Employee was going to improve with continued conservative management, due to
the degree of stenosis. Dr. Kralick recommended operative intervention, which
would consist of a two level disc excision osteophyte removal and spinal canal
decompression with instrumented fusion at C5-6 and C6-7.
Id.
22) On August 25, 2005, Employee underwent a pre-operative
cervical spine x-ray series. The impression was significant degenerative
cervical disc changes at C5-6 and C6-7. Id.
23) On August 26, 2005, Dr. Thomas Dietrich treated Employee
and diagnosed moderately severe degenerative cervical disc disease at C5-6 and
C6-7, clinical indications of cervical spinal cord involvement and depression.
Dr. Dietrich did not attribute any of his diagnoses to any work incident or
injury. Dr. Dietrich opined Employee was not medically stable, nor capable of
returning to his work as a school bus driver until Employee had better motility
of his neck. Id.
24) On August 29, 2005, Dr. Kralick performed an anterior
diskectomy and interbody fusion on instrumentation C5, C6 and C7, at Alaska
Regional Hospital. Employee was discharged on September 2, 2005.
Id.
25) On October 10, 2005, Employee had an x-ray series of the
cervical spine. The impression was a stable postoperative grafted and
instrumented anterior two level cervical fusion. Id.
26) On January 22, 2007, Employee was assaulted by a high
school student in a high school parking lot. Employee was reportedly punched,
and kicked in the head and neck, face and ear. He was seen at Alaska Regional
Hospital Emergency Room complaining of neck, head and ear pain. The diagnoses
given were: 1) facial contusion, and 2) closed head injury. Employee did not
believe he lost consciousness but did feel a crunch in the back of his head and
complained of neck pain. He did not believe he was kicked in the chest or
abdomen. Id. at 4.
27) On January 22, 2007, Employee had a CT scan of his head;
the impression was negative. Employee also had a CT scan of his cervical spine;
the impression was no evidence of acute fracture or malalignment.
Post-operative changes of anterior fusion C5-C7 were noted, as well as severe
degenerative changes posterior facets as described, multiple levels. A CT scan
of Employee's face was also taken; no facial fracture was identified. Minimal
right anterior ethmoid chronic sinusitis was noted. Id.
28) On January 24, 2007, Dr. Skala treated Employee, prescribed
medication for pain and inflammation, and restricted Employee from work through
Monday. However, on the physician's report of the same date, Dr. Skala wrote
Employee was not released and it was unknown for how long.
Id.
29) On January 29, 2007, Employee was seen in the Alaska
Regional Emergency Room for ongoing pain along the left occiput to the front,
and in his left AC area. Employee also reported pain in his right hip area
where he was kicked, and thought he had some sciatica from that. Another CT
scan of the head was taken to eliminate possibility of intracranial hemorrhage,
which was found to be negative...
To continue reading
Request your trial