12-0096. JEFFREY L. HENDRICKS Employee v. THE HOME DEPOT INC. Employer and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO. Insurer Defendants.
Court | Alaska |
Alaska Workers Compensation Decisions
2012.
Workers' Compensation Board
12-0096.
JEFFREY L. HENDRICKS Employee v. THE HOME DEPOT INC. Employer and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO. Insurer Defendants
ALASKA WORKERS'
COMPENSATION BOARDP.O. Box 115512 Juneau, Alaska
99811-5512JEFFREY L. HENDRICKS,
Employee, Applicant v. THE HOME DEPOT INC., Employer, and NEW HAMPSHIRE
INSURANCE CO., Insurer, Defendants.AWCB Case
No. 200918260AWCB Decision No.
12-0096Filed with AWCB Anchorage, Alaska
on June 11, 2012FINAL
DECISION AND ORDERJeffrey L. Hendricks (Employee) and The Home Deport, Inc. and
New Hampshire Insurance (collectively Employer) mediated Employee's workers'
compensation claim (WCC) and reached a settlement. As part of the settlement,
the parties requested a hearing on Employee's claim for ongoing medical
treatment. The request to approve the settlement and Employee's claim for
ongoing medical benefits were heard on April 11, 2012, in Anchorage, Alaska.
Attorney Charles Coe represented Employee. Attorney Michael Budzinski
represented Employer. The settlement was approved orally and this decision
memorializes the findings of fact and legal conclusions regarding Employee's
claim for ongoing medical benefits reached at the hearing on April 11,
2012.
ISSUES
Employee contends he has substantial ongoing medical problems
for which the 2009 injury is the substantial cause of Employee's need for
treatment and disability.
Employer contends Employee has a substantial history of many
severe medical problems prior to the work injury which are the substantial
cause of his ongoing medical problems. Therefore, Employer contends no
additional medical benefits are owed to Employee now or in the future.
Furthermore, Employer contends it has a credit against any medical benefits it
might owe Employee from Employee's third-party settlement with the driver of
the truck which hit Employee. Employer asserts since it has a credit against
the settlement proceeds and these proceeds are of a sufficient size, Employer
would not be liable to Employee, now or in the future, for any additional
medical treatment as a result of the work injury. Employer further contends the
settlement reached is in Employee's best interest because Employee would not be
awarded any additional benefits at hearing.
1) Is Employee entitled to any additional medical benefits in
the future as a result of the 2009 work injury?
2) Should the settlement agreement be approved as being in
Employee's best interest?
FINDINGS OF FACT
A review of the entire record establishes the following facts
and factual conclusions by a preponderance of the evidence:
1) On June 29, 2009, Employee was struck in the back by a
customer's truck in Employer's pickup area. The impact flipped Employee over
the end of the pick-up (Report of Injury; security video).
2) The police report indicated Employee was laying face down
when they arrived on the scene and was complaining of neck and back pain
(Accident Report, Employee's Notice of Intent to Rely, August 3, 2011).
3) Employee was taken to Valley Hospital Emergency Room for
left hip pain, neck pain, and rib discomfort (Compromise and Release (CandR),
approved April 12, 2012).
4) Employee has a long history of back and neck complaints,
from at least 1985. Medical records reflect Employee was prescribed Flexeril
for headaches and neck pain by Morris R. Horning, M.D., in 1985 (00002 Jeffrey
Hendricks Medical Records (SIME Binder)).
5) On June 23, 1986, Employee reported "another motor vehicle
accident" to Dr. Horning. The diagnosis was neck sprain. Employee's scoliosis
was noted (00006 SIME Binder).
6) On October 1, 1986, Employee was seen for spinal cord
monitoring consultation following a posterior fusion with Harrington rod
instrumentation from T4 to L3 (00007-12 SIME Binder).
7) On July 1, 1987, Employee underwent an electromyography
(EMG) evaluation with Dr. Horning, which showed mild acute right L5
radiculopathy (00016 SIME Binder).
8) On January 19, 1988, Employee saw Dr. Horning with
continuing complaints of back pain, although much improved and without evidence
of acute radiculopathy. Employee was to start vocational retraining (00020 SIME
Binder).
9) On May 16, 1988, Employee saw William J. Mills, Jr., M.D.,
with complaints of back pain. Employee inquired about removal of the Harrington
rods. The x-rays showed excellent position of the rods with no evidence of
nonunion and Dr. Mills did not recommend removal (00023 SIME Binder).
10) On May 25, 1988, Employee saw Dr. Horning for ongoing
headaches and back pain which Employee thought might be attributable to the
Harrington rods. Employee was to follow up with Harold King, M.D., University
of Washington (00024 SIME Binder) .
11) On June 16, 1988, Dr. King opined Employee would be
unlikely to return to work due to chronic back pain and scoliosis. Dr. King
recommended Employee follow-up with a neurologist for his migraine headaches
and right-sided sensory symptoms (00028 SIME Binder) .
12) On June 14, 1989, Dr. Horning, using AMA Guides to
Permanent Impairment, rated Employee as having a 28% permanent partial
impairment (PPI) as a result of the T4-L3 fusion. (00047 SIME Binder) .
13) On March 28, 1990, Dr. Horning saw Employee and diagnosed
(1) achondroplastic dwarfism, (2) status-post fusion from T4 to L3 due to
scoliosis, (3) reduced range of motion secondary to numbers 1 and 2, (4)
chronic head and neck ache from muscle contraction pain and migraines, and (5)
left elbow arthritis. These conditions were permanent and stationary but
Employee's condition was expected to deteriorate over time. Employee had
permanent lifting restrictions (00052 SIME Binder) .
14) On June 16, 1994, Employee saw Davis Peterson, M.D.,
following an onset of pain after lifting grader tires while working for the
Municipality of Anchorage. A neurological evaluation was recommended (00072-73
SIME Binder) .
15) On August 14, 1994, Dr. King noted back pain (post
scoliosis) , migraine headaches, and history of numbness and tingling in the
upper and lower extremities. He recommended Employee see a neurologist
(00074-75 SIME Binder) .
16) On August 16, 1994, Philip L. Grisham, M.D., conducted a
neurological evaluation and recommended nerve conduction studies (00079-80 SIME
Binder) .
17) Henk I. Dawson, M.D., did the nerve conduction testing and
found the study normal with no electrophysiologic evidence to suggest
radiculopathy or peripheral neuropathy (00081 SIME Binder) .
18) On November 7, 1995, Employee saw Dr. Peterson for severe
right radiating leg pain. Dr. Peterson found no fixed radiculopathy and
recommended a CT of lumbar spine (00092 SIME Binder) .
19) On November 6, 1997, Employee was seen at Providence
Hospital Emergency Room after a fall on the ice. His assessment was back
contusion, with the Harrington rods stable on x-ray (00094 SIME Binder)
.
20) On August 4, 1998, Employee was seen for back pain
following an altercation and treated for a hemopneumothorax and rib fracture
(00110 SIME Binder) .
21) On December 15, 1998, Employee again saw Dr. Peterson for
pain at the upper left side of his scoliosis incision and at the left upper
shoulder and trapezius level. Dr. Peterson recommended physical therapy
(00194-195 SIME Binder) .
22) On January 14, 1999, Dr. Peterson reviewed the cervical MRI
which was normal. Physical therapy was helping (00208 SIME Binder) .
23) On September 15, 1999, Employee saw John E. Hall, M.D., at
Providence Emergency Room following a motor vehicle accident. The assessment
was contusion of the chest wall and musculoskeletal strain cervical (00218 SIME
Binder) .
24) On March 16, 2000, Dr. Peterson noted Employee was involved
in another motor vehicle accident on February 25, 2000, with resulting neck and
left shoulder pain and complaints of low back pain (00242-243 SIME
Binder).
25) On September 8, 2000, Employee saw Dr. Peterson reporting
another auto accident on August 10, 2000, when he was rear-ended (00252 SIME
Binder) .
26) On October 3, 2000, Employee reported to Dr. Peterson an
onset of severe back and buttock pain, following the August accident. Dr.
Peterson recommended an MRI of L4-5 and L5-S1. The MRI scan was normal (00277
SIME Binder) .
27) On November 27, 2000, Dr. Peterson noted Employee had a
nerve root block at S1 with transient pain relief. He suspected a root traction
injury or S1 radiculitis and increased Employee's Neurontin to 200 mg. three
times a day. On December 13, 2000, Employee complained of increased pain and
right foot numbness (00285 SIME Binder) .
28) On January 22, 2001, Employee reported to Dr. Peterson he
had seen J. Michael James, M.D., who recommended physical therapy and an
increase in Neurontin for pain management. (00286 SIME Binder) .
29) On March 27, 2001, Employee reported to Dr. Peterson
continuing left leg pain after an EMG and nerve conduction studies (NCS) ,
which showed L5 acute and chronic radiculopathy (0266-0290 SIME Binder)
.
30) On September 13, 2002, Dr. Peterson saw Employee for
chronic back pain and right leg radiation. His assessment was probable S1
radiculitis from mild degenerative changes L3 to sacrum. Dr. Peterson
prescribed Bextra and swimming (00332 SIME Binder) .
31) On October 2, 2002, Employee continued to have severe back,
buttock and radiating thigh pain. The standing AP pelvis view was normal. An
MRI was scheduled (00333 SIME Binder) .
32) On October 29, 2002, Employee had an MRI, which was
compared to the October 2000 MRI and showed stability with...
To continue reading
Request your trial