121118 NYEO, ETH 1158

Case DateDecember 11, 2018
CourtNew York
ETH 1158
Ethics Opinion 1158
New York Ethics Opinion
New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics
December 11, 2018
         Inquiry No. 16-18          Topic: Conflicts, lawyer seeking new employment          Digest: Subject to provisions regarding protection of confidential information and personal conflicts of interest, and other Rules discussed in this Opinion, a lawyer who has worked on regulatory drafting as in-house counsel for a tax authority may seek new employment in a position seeking to change the current tax code and may work in such a position after leaving the agency.          Rules: 1.1(c)(2), 1.6, 1.7, 1.9(c), 1.11          FACTS          1. Inquirer is an attorney with the Internal Revenue Service. The lawyer worked on a range of matters over his career at the IRS, including recent work on certain regulatory provisions. Inquirer is seeking other employment, including in positions where the goal is to change the current tax code. As part of these efforts to seek employment, the inquirer would like to seek funding and engage in discussions with academics and practitioners to secure their participation in a project to reform the current tax code.          QUESTION          2. May inquirer communicate with funders to seek funding, and with academics and practitioners to secure their participation in the project, while still employed at the IRS?          3. May inquirer communicate with funders and others in connection with this project after he leaves the IRS?          OPINION          4. We address in this opinion only the provisions of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (the “Rules”) and assume that the inquirer’s proposed activities comply with any other applicable laws and regulations.          Inquirer’s Current Job-Seeking Activities          5. There are four provisions of the Rules that may restrict the inquirer’s current job-seeking activities, but none is likely to pose a significant limitation.          6. First, the inquirer may not disclose confidential information in violation of Rule 1.6. Confidential information “consists of information gained during or relating to the representation of a client...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT