2012-EB-3 (2010). IN RE: DANIEL ESCAMILLA Respondent.

• Court: California

California Workers Compensation Decisions 2012. 2012-EB-3 (2010). IN RE: DANIEL ESCAMILLA Respondent WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIAIN RE: DANIEL ESCAMILLA, Respondent.Misc. No. 254OPINION AND ORDERS DENYING PETITIONS FILED ON MARCH 16, 2012 AND MARCH 30, 2012 (EN BANC)Daniel Escamilla, in propria persona, has filed two petitions. The first, filed on March 16, 2012, is captioned Petition for Order Requiring Board to Produce All Case Documents Relating to Sanction Proceedings in Eleven Cases Being Used Against Respondent. The second, filed on March 30, 2012, is captioned Objection to Order Requiring Submission of Offer of Proof and Petition for Removal to Obtain Ruling on Petition to Produce and to Obtain Clarification of Specific Issues to be Determined by Board in Connection with its Determination under Labor Code Section 4907. Although the relief sought by Mr. Escamilla is not clearly stated, in the March 16, 2012 petition, Mr. Escamilla seeks production of "a complete file of the documents relating to the eleven sanctions orders." In the March 30, 2012 petition, Mr. Escamilla (1) "objects to, and seeks removal of, the WCJ's order of March 16, 2012 requiring 'a written, specific and non-generalized offer of proof as to the expected testimony of each person he desires to call as a witness in these proceedings,'" (2) "seeks removal of the WCJ's refusal to rule on the Petition for Order Requiring Board to Produce All Case Documents Relating to Sanction Proceedings in Eleven Cases Being Used Against [Respondent]," and (3) "seeks an opinion from the Board providing clarification of the specific issues to be determined in this matter, including an opinion as to whether Respondent's moral character is at issue." We have considered the petitions and the written reply to Mr. Escamilla's March 30, 2012 petition filed by John Shields, prosecuting attorney for the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), and we have reviewed the record in this matter. For the reasons discussed below, we will deny Mr. Escamilla's petitions. The specific pattern of conduct at issue was set forth in the September 21, 2011 Notice of Hearing Regarding Suspension or Removal of Privilege of Daniel Escamilla to Appear in any Proceeding as a Representative of any Party before the Appeals Board or any Workers' Compensation...