22-11WC. Rebecca Collins v. State of Vermont.
Court | Vermont |
Vermont Workers Compensation
2011.
22-11WC.
Rebecca Collins v. State of Vermont
Rebecca Collins v. State of Vermont(August 8, 2011)STATE
OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOROpinion No. 22-11WCBy:
Phyllis Phillips, Esq. Hearing OfficerFor: Anne M. Noonan CommissionerState File No. AA-03636OPINION AND
ORDERHearing held in
Montpelier, Vermont on March 29, 2011 Record closed on April 29,
2011APPEARANCES:
Kelly Massicotte Esq., for
Claimant William Blake, Esq., for Defendant
ISSUES PRESENTED:
1. Was Claimant's right hip injury causally related to her April
13, 2009 work accident?
2. If yes, to what workers' compensation benefits is she
entitled?
EXHIBITS
Joint Exhibit I: Medical records
Claimant's Exhibit 1:Dr. Weiss consultation, June 16, 2009
Claimant's Exhibit 2: Curriculum vitae, George
White, M.D.
Claimant's Exhibit 3: Excerpted sections of AMA Guides to
the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th ed.
Defendant's Exhibit A: Deposition of John Johansson, D.O.,
November 30, 2010
Defendant's Exhibit B: Curriculum vitae, John
Johansson, D.O.
Defendant's Exhibit C: Medical records prior to April 13,
2009
Defendant's Exhibit D: M. Groh and J. Herrera, A
Comprehensive Review ofLabral Tears, Current Review
of Musculoskeletal Medicine 2:105-117 (2009)
Defendant's Exhibit E: Denial of Workers' Compensation Benefits
(Form 2)
CLAIM:
Temporary total disability benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A.
§642
Temporary partial disability benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A.
§646
Permanent partial disability benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A.
§648
Medical benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A. §640
Interest, costs and attorney fees pursuant to 21 V.S.A.
§§664 and 678
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1 .At all times relevant to these proceedings, Claimant was an
employee and Defendant was an employer as those terms are defined in Vermont
Compensation Act.
2. Judicial notice is taken of all relevant forms contained in
the Department's file relating to this claim.
3. Claimant works for Defendant as a probation and parole
officer. Her duties include supervising convicted offenders on parole,
probation and house arrest status. This often involves conducting field checks
on offenders at their homes.
4. Claimant is a physically active person. She enjoys running,
golf, tennis hiking, biking and other activities.
Claimant's April 13, 2009 Work
Injury
5. On April 13, 2009 Claimant traveled in her car to Milton,
Vermont to perform a field check at a client's home. Upon arrival she parked in
the driveway, which was somewhat slanted, then exited the car and proceeded to
the house. She knocked on the door, and as she was waiting for the client to
open it she glanced back and saw that her car was rolling backwards down the
driveway. Claimant ran to her car and positioned herself behind it, with her
left shoulder against the rear end and her right leg braced as an anchor, but
the car kept rolling. Over the next few moments, she tried repeatedly to
re-anchor her right leg, but as the car picked up speed its force continued to
jerk her down the driveway. Finally she stepped aside and watched as the car
rolled across the road, through a ditch and into a neighbor's yard.
6. Claimant was understandably shaken by this incident.
Nevertheless, she retrieved her car and drove back to her office. Her right leg
was hurting and shaking, in what she described as a "weird body sensation."
Claimant reported the incident to her supervisor, worked the remainder of the
day, then went home and iced her ankle, which seemed to be hurting the
most.
7. The next day Claimant presented to her primary care provider,
Dr. Dill, complaining of right ankle pain. Dr. Dill diagnosed a right ankle
sprain and prescribed ice, elevation and an air cast for up to one month. She
also advised Claimant not to run for two weeks.
8. Dr. Dill's office note does not reflect that Claimant
complained of any pain in her right hip at the time of her April 14th
examination. Claimant does not recall if she did so or not. She was focused on
her right ankle at the time because that was where she was experiencing the
most pain.
9. In keeping with Dr. Dill's advice, Claimant refrained from
running until early May. By then her ankle pain had improved and...
To continue reading
Request your trial