230309A. LAWRENCE A. WRIGHT.
Case Date | October 10, 2003 |
Court | Kansas |
Kansas Workers Compensation
2003(5).
230309A.
LAWRENCE A. WRIGHT
For Case Summaries go to:
Table of
ContentsKeyword ListingOctober 10, 2003DOCKET NO. 230,309ABEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION
OF WORKERS COMPENSATION LAWRENCE
A. WRIGHT
Claimant VS.
Docket No. 230,309 GCR TRUCK TIRE CENTER
Respondent AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE
STATE OF) PENNSYLVANIA
Insurance Carrier
ORDER
Respondent appeals the August 22, 2000, Award of Administrative
Law Judge Brad E. Avery. Claimant was awarded a 14 percent whole body
functional impairment, followed by a 76.5 percent permanent partial disability
to the body as a whole, followed by a 66 percent permanent partial disability
to the body as a whole, for a total award not to exceed $100,000 for injuries
suffered to his low back. Respondent contends claimant did not prove his
accidental injury arose out of and in the course of his employment, nor did he
provide timely notice. Respondent further argues the Administrative Law Judge
did not give respondent ample time to brief this matter. The Appeals Board held
oral argument on February 20, 2001. Appearances
Claimant appeared by his attorney, John J. Bryan of Topeka,
Kansas. Respondent and its insurance carrier appeared by their attorney,
Michael R. Kauphusman of Overland Park, Kansas. Record and Stipulations The Appeals Board has considered the record and adopts the
stipulations contained in the Award of the Administrative Law Judge. Issues (1) What is the nature and
extent of claimant's injury and/or disability? (2)
Did claimant provide timely notice of accident? (3)
Did the Administrative Law Judge err by issuing an award in this matter prior
to the respondent being given an opportunity to submit its brief? (4) Should the conclusion of Mary Titterington's deposition
taken on August 23, 2000, be included in the record?Respondent also raises all issues raised before the
Administrative Law Judge in its Application for Review, which include the
following additional issues:
(5) Did claimant prove that he
suffered accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment
with respondent? (6) Is claimant entitled to future and unauthorized medical as
a result of this injury?
Respondent also disputed the average weekly wage finding of the
Administrative Law Judge in its appeal. However, in its brief to the Board,
respondent acknowledged that it had no quarrel with the average weekly wage
found by the Administrative Law Judge in the amount of $633.73. The Appeals
Board, therefore, affirms the Administrative Law Judge's finding of claimant's
$633.73 average weekly wage. Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law Based upon the evidence presented, the Appeals Board finds that
the Award of the Administrative Law Judge should be modified.
Claimant began working for respondent in 1995 as an off-road
tire fixer. Claimant's duties required that he travel to different locations
and fix tires on tractors, graders and other pieces of equipment. Claimant's
job required that he lift heavy weights on a regular basis, with the tires
weighing anywhere from 75 up to 200 pounds. Tractor tires would be even larger
than that, but claimant was provided a hoist to help with the tires he was
unable to handle. Claimant testified that he occasionally suffered back
problems as a result of the heavy physical labor required in this job. The fact
that this was a heavy physical labor job was confirmed by several respondent
employees, including respondent's store manager, Billy Joe (Red) Everhart, the
office and credit manager, David Lee Lancaster, the service manager, Robert W.
Meyer, and the assistant manager, Jerry Shelman.
Claimant first experienced low back problems in February of
1996. He went to a Dr. Douglas Boehr, a chiropractor, for an adjustment.
Claimant saw Dr. Boehr again on May 8, 1996, in November 1996 and again in May
1997. With the exception of the May 1997 visits, claimant's back always
improved after the adjustments by Dr. Boehr.
After receiving two treatments in May of 1997 and showing no
improvement, claimant went to see Mark Newth, D.O., a family practitioner. Dr.
Newth first saw claimant on September 20, 1995, as a new patient. The first
time Dr. Newth examined claimant for low back symptoms was on February 3, 1997.
He was advised at that time that claimant was a tire changer for respondent. He
ordered x-rays, diagnosing lumbar arthritis and bilateral L5 spondylolysis and
grade I spondylolisthesis at L5 and S1. Claimant was again seen in Dr. Newth's
office for his low back on May 21, 1997, at which time claimant had low back
and neck pain and right leg numbness. When Dr. Newth examined claimant on June
27, 1997, he continued to complain of low back pain. Claimant advised Dr. Newth
he had obtained chiropractic adjustments in the interim, but that they did not
help. Claimant again discussed the fact that his job required heavy lifting.
Dr. Newth last saw claimant on August 5, 1997, with his ultimate diagnosis
being a herniated disc at L4-L5 on the right and a central disc at L1-2. The
herniation diagnosis was in addition to the spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis
diagnoses earlier discussed. On July 21, 1997, claimant contacted Dr. Newth's
office by telephone, discussing his increased back symptoms. Due to the
increase in pain, Dr. Newth recommended claimant not work until he saw John
Ebeling. M.D. An appointment was scheduled for August 14, 1997. Claimant was
provided stronger pain medication including Relafen and Flexeril. Due to the
significant pain he was experiencing, claimant underwent an epidural injection
on July 30, 1997.
Claimant's last day of work with respondent was July 24, 1997.
Claimant had driven to Wamego, Kansas, to repair a tractor tire on that date.
He replaced the tractor tire, but experienced significantly more difficulties
with his back while performing...
To continue reading
Request your trial