4-109-862 (1998). MICHAEL H. CAMPBELL (Order 1).

• Case Date: July 10, 1998
• Court: Colorado

Colorado Workers Compensation 1998. 4-109-862 (1998). MICHAEL H. CAMPBELL (Order 1) INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICEIN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF JOANN MAES, Claimant, v. C.N.A.'S A PLENTY INC., Employer, and COLORADO COMPENSATION INSURANCE AUTHORITY, Insurer, Respondents.W. C. No. 4-336-855ORDER The pro se claimant seeks review of an order of Administrative Law Judge Erickson (ALJ Erickson) dated March 12, 1998. We dismiss the appeal without prejudice. On October 22, 1997 Pre-hearing Administrative Law Judge (PALJ) Muramoto entered an order which required the claimant to comply with discovery, struck the claimant's application for hearing and prohibited the claimant from filing a new application for hearing until she complied with discovery. The claimant subsequently filed a new application for hearing. The respondents moved to strike the application for hearing on grounds that the claimant had not complied with discovery. ALJ Erickson granted the motion on March 12, 1998, and vacated the hearing scheduled for March 19, 1998. Section 8-43-301(2), C.R.S. 1997 provides that a party dissatisfied with an order "which requires any party to pay a penalty or benefits or denies a claimant a benefit or penalty," may file a petition to review. Orders which do not require the payment of benefits or penalties, or deny the claimant benefits or penalties are interlocutory and not subject to review. Natkin and Co. v. Eubanks, 775 P.2d 88 (Colo. App. 1989). The order on review does not require the respondents to pay a benefit or penalty. Nor does the order...