4-285-320 (1998). GUSTAVO LOZANO.

Case DateAugust 03, 1998
CourtColorado
Colorado Workers Compensation 1998. 4-285-320 (1998). GUSTAVO LOZANO INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICEIN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF GUSTAVO LOZANO, Claimant, v. FRONT RANGE REBAR CO., INC., Employer, and COLORADO COMPENSATION INSURANCE AUTHORITY, Insurer, Respondents.W. C. No. 4-285-320FINAL ORDER The claimant seeks review of a final order of Administrative Law Judge Gandy (ALJ), which barred the claimant's right to temporary disability benefits based on his failure to attend a Division-sponsored independent medical examination (IME). The claimant also seeks review of an underlying order of Prehearing Administrative Law Judge Muramoto (PALJ Muramoto), which required him to attend the Division-sponsored IME, and granted the respondents' motion for a protective order. We reverse the ALJ's order insofar as it terminated the claimant's right to receive temporary benefits, and otherwise dismiss the petition to review without prejudice. This case has a complex procedural history. A review of that history in necessary to an understanding of the issues. In November 1996, the treating physician placed the claimant at maximum medical improvement (MMI) and assessed a seventeen percent whole person medical impairment rating. On November 14, 1996, the respondents requested a Division-sponsored IME on the issue of permanent impairment. In accordance with procedures established by the Division of Workers' Compensation (Division), Dr. McLaughlin, a physiatrist, was selected to conduct the IME. On December 12, 1996, the claimant filed with the Division a pleading entitled "Motion Opposing IME Panel Selection." Essentially, this motion asserted the claimant did not receive notice of the respondents' request for an IME, and that orthopedic physicians rather than physiatrists should have comprised the panel. However, on December 27, 1996, PALJ Purdie denied claimant's motion and "allowed" the IME to proceed. On January 9, 1997, the claimant filed an application for hearing, and he listed the issues as "Propriety of IME Panel Selection, jurisdiction of Pre-hearing Administrative Law Judges." A hearing on these issues was apparently scheduled for May 7, 1997. On April 15, 1997 a prehearing conference was held before PALJ Muramoto. Counsel for claimant declined to attend the prehearing conference, and the conference proceeded without him. On April 18, 1997, PALJ Muramoto entered two orders. The first order, entitled "Pre-hearing Order," granted the respondents' motion to compel the claimant to attend an IME with Dr. McLaughlin scheduled for June 10, 1997. In support, the order notes the claimant failed to attend an IME with Dr. McLaughlin on January 28, 1997. The order also granted the respondents' motion for protective order concerning discovery. PALJ Muramoto ruled that interrogatories which the claimant propounded to the respondents were not submitted in a timely fashion, and were "over broad, unduly burdensome, and largely irrelevant." Generally, these interrogatories concerned the respondent-insurer's (CCIA) "SelectNet" medical system and possible bias stemming from Dr. McLaughlin's participation in the system. In a second order of April 18, PALJ Muramoto denied the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT