5300 CRB-8-07-12 (2009). Wiggins v. City of Middletown.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2009.
5300 CRB-8-07-12 (2009).
Wiggins v. City of Middletown
CASE NO.5300
CRB-8-07-12COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 2009WILLIAM J. WIGGINS, JR.
CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN EMPLOYER and WEBSTER RISK SERVICES,
INC. INSURER RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS APPEARANCES: The claimant was represented by Jeffrey Oliveira,
Esq., Martocchio & Oliveira, LLC, 191 Main Street, Southington, CT 06489.
The respondents were represented by Michael McAuliffe, Esq., Pomeranz, Drayton
& Stabnick, 95 Glastonbury Boulevard, Glastonbury, CT 06033. Respondents
were formerly represented by James Baldwin, Esq., Coles, Baldwin & Kaiser,
LLC, 1261 Post Road, Fairfield, CT 06824. This Petition for Review from the
November 19, 2007 Finding and Award of the Commissioner acting for the Eighth
District was heard November 21, 2008 before a Compensation Review Board panel
consisting of the Commission Chairman John A. Mastropietro and Commissioners
Ernie R. Walker and Charles F. Senich. OPINION JOHN A.
MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN. The appeal herein is from a decision that the
claimant's shoulder injuries were the result of an injury sustained in the
workplace. The respondents argue the trial commissioner lacked sufficient
probative evidence to award the claimant benefits for this injury. Our review
indicates that the claimant's treating physician offered competent testimony
which supported this award. Since we cannot revisit a trial commissioner's
weighing of medical evidence, we affirm the Finding and Award and dismiss this
appeal. The present claim was occasioned by an incident that claimant
says occurred at work on November 2, 2003.(fn1) On that day, the claimant said
he injured his shoulder while pulling a "Scott Pak;" which is a respiratory
device which was affixed to a fire engine. The claimant testified that he
reported this incident immediately to his employer. On April 23, 2004, the
claimant filed a Form 30C stating that due to the injury he felt pain in his
right arm, elbow, shoulder, wrist and hand.
Prior to the November 2, 2003 incident the claimant had sustained
accepted compensable injuries to his right master elbow, shoulder and wrist on
October 16, 1999. These injuries required wrist and right elbow surgery. The
juxtaposition of these injuries is relevant to the issues herein.
The claimant treated with Dr. Terry Reardon, a board certified
orthopedist, for his various injuries. On February 10, 2004, while treating his
wrist and elbow injuries, the claimant told Dr. Reardon that he was "having
problems in his shoulder." Dr. Reardon's records do not reflect further
complaints as to the shoulder during 2004. The claimant underwent right elbow
surgery on April 1, 2004. The claimant testified that he wanted to resolve the
elbow injury prior to addressing his shoulder pain. He resumed treating for the
shoulder pain on June 1, 2005.
Prior to resuming treatment for his shoulder, the claimant was
involved in a motor vehicle accident on March 6, 2005. He testified he injured
his lower back as a result of the accident. Subsequent to this accident the
claimant treated at Valley Physical Therapy. The claimant filled out a
questionnaire for Valley Physical Therapy stating his shoulder pain commenced
in March of 2005. At the formal hearing, the claimant testified this statement
was a mistake. The motor vehicle claim was settled on October 27, 2005.
The claimant underwent physical therapy for his shoulder injury
in 2005 but this modality of treatment did not prove successful. He returned to
Dr. Reardon and underwent additional testing and on December 7, 2005 underwent
surgery. Following the surgery Dr. Reardon found the...
To continue reading
Request your trial