5373 CRB-8-08-8 (2009). Schleidt v. Eldredge Carpentry, LLC et al.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2009.
5373 CRB-8-08-8 (2009).
Schleidt v. Eldredge Carpentry, LLC et al
CASE NO. 5373
CRB-8-08-8COMPENSATION REVIEW
BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONJULY 14, 2009TIMOTHY W. SCHLEIDT CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v. ELDREDGE CARPENTRY, LLC EMPLOYER and TOWN OF OLD SAYBROOK EMPLOYER and CIRMA
INSURER RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES and SECOND INJURY FUND
RESPONDENT-APPELLEEAPPEARANCES: The claimant was represented by Peter G. Perakos,
II, Esq., and Barry Zitser, Esq., Perakos & Zitser, P.C., 44 Capitol
Avenue, Suite 302, Hartford, CT 06106-1706. The respondent-employer was
represented by Michael McCormack, Esq. Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLP, 205
Church Street, P.O. Box 1936, New Haven, CT 06509-1910. The respondents Town of
Old Saybrook and CIRMA were represented by Jason M. Dodge, Esq., Pomeranz,
Drayton & Stabnick, 95 Glastonbury Boulevard, Glastonbury, CT 06033. The
Second Injury Fund was represented by Philip Schulz, Esq., Assistant Attorney
General, Office of the Attorney General, 55 Elm Street, Hartford, CT
06141-0120. This Petition for Review from the August 14, 2008 Finding and
Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Eighth District was heard February
27, 2009 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission
Chairman John A. Mastropietro and Commissioners Peter C. Mlynarczyk and Randy
L. Cohen.OPINION JOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN. In Hanson v.
Transportation General, Inc., 245 Conn. 613, 625 (1998), the Supreme Court
determined that "the totality of factors" must be weighed in the determination
of when a claimant for workers' compensation benefits has established the
jurisdictional requirement of an employer-employee relationship. The trial
commissioner in the present case concluded that the claimant had failed to
prove that such a relationship existed at the time of his injury, and therefore
dismissed the claim. The claimant has appealed arguing that he in fact proved
the existence of this relationship. On review, we find the trial commissioner
properly applied the test in Hanson, supra. We affirm the Finding and Dismissal
and dismiss this appeal.The commissioner reached the following conclusions after a
lengthy formal hearing which yielded 71 findings of fact. The trial
commissioner found the claimant neither credible nor persuasive; but found the
respondent's witnesses were credible and persuasive. He found the claimant was
injured on April 10, 2006 when he was standing on a metal scaffold that
collapsed. The claimant sustained injuries to his left foot, left tibia, left
fibula, and two vertebrae. He had been providing carpentry services to the
respondent Eldredge Carpentry LLC since late December 2004. At the time of the
injury the claimant had been working alone and unsupervised for almost one
hour.
The trial commissioner found the claimant had worked for other
people in the carpentry field after commencing his relationship with Eldredge.
He also concluded the claimant brought his own tools and equipment to the job
site, including a circular saw and screw gun, and did not receive paid
vacation, paid sick time, paid health insurance or pension benefits during his
time at Eldredge Carpentry LLC. The claimant filed his federal income taxes as
a self-employed sole...
To continue reading
Request your trial