5391 CRB-8-08-11 (2009). KASPERN v. ESTES EXPRESS LINES.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2009.
5391 CRB-8-08-11 (2009).
KASPERN v. ESTES EXPRESS LINES
CASE NO. 5391
CRB-8-08-11COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION OCTOBER 28, 2009MICHAEL J. KASPERN CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v.
ESTES EXPRESS LINES EMPLOYER and GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS and LOWE'S EMPLOYER and SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEESAPPEARANCES: The claimant was represented by Charles Norris,
Esq., and Thomas J. Sousa, Jr., Esq., Chinigo, Leone & Maruzo, LLP, 141
Broadway, P.O. Box 510, Norwich, CT 06360. Respondents Estes Express Lines and
Gallagher Bassett Services were represented by Michael V. Vocalina, Esq.,
Cotter, Cotter & Mullins, LLC, 6515 Main Street, Suite 10, Trumbull, CT
06611. Respondents Lowe's and Specialty Risk Services were represented by David
A. Kelly, Esq., Montstream & May, 655 Winding Brook Drive, P.O. Box 1087,
Glastonbury, CT 06033-6087. This Petition for Review from the October 16, 2008
Finding and Award of the Commissioner acting for the Second District was heard
on May 29, 2009 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the
Commission Chairman John A. Mastropietro and Commissioners Peter C. Mlynarczyk
and Randy L. Cohen.OPINION JOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN.
The claimant has petitioned for review from the October 16, 2008 Finding and
Award of the Commissioner acting for the Second District. We find no error and
accordingly affirm the decision of the trial commissioner.(fn1)The following factual findings are pertinent to our review. On
April 30, 2005, the claimant sustained a compensable injury to his left
shoulder. At that time, the claimant was employed by Estes Express Lines as a
tractor-trailer driver making deliveries for Home Depot. The claimant drove a
flat bed tractor-trailer with a detachable forklift mounted on the back end of
the trailer. The claimant testified that he made ten to twelve deliveries per
day, and that each time he made a delivery, he had to climb up into the
forklift, detach it from the trailer, make the delivery, reattach the forklift,
and climb back down. The truck was loaded by other Home Depot employees.
The claimant treated conservatively at the Norwich Orthopedic
Group, where Daniel T. Glenney, M.D. diagnosed rotator cuff tendonitis and
administered an injection. A voluntary agreement for this injury was approved
on November 14, 2005. On May 18, 2006, Dr. Glenney determined that the claimant
had reached maximum medical improvement and sustained a five-percent permanent
partial disability to the left shoulder. Dr. Glenney stated that additional
treatment options included antiinflammatory medication and repeat injections,
and if such treatment failed to ameliorate the claimant's symptoms, he would
recommend arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
On or about the end of December 2005, Estes Express lost its
contract with Home Depot and the claimant began driving a tractor trailer for
Lowe's similar to the tractor trailer he had driven for Estes Express. The
claimant testified that in addition to making deliveries, the employment at
Lowe's required more preparatory work such as processing order paperwork;
shrink wrapping the merchandise for delivery, and loading the truck. The
claimant testified that the work he did for Estes was "significantly busier,"
Findings, ¶ 9, as he generally did three to four deliveries a day, or
approximately fifteen to twenty a week, for Lowe's.
At the request of the respondent Estes Express, the claimant was
evaluated by Gerard Lawrence, M.D., on June 23, 2006. Dr. Lawrence noted that
the claimant, despite having changed the way he loads and unloads delivery
material, was continuing to have shoulder pain when he "abducts" and
"externally rotates." Claimant's Exhibit B. Dr. Lawrence concluded that the
claimant was suffering from chronic impingement syndrome which was not likely
to improve on its own and would possibly require an arthroscopic decompression.
Dr. Lawrence also concurred with the five percent permanent partial disability
rating given by Dr. Glenney, and opined that "the claimant's left shoulder pain
is causally related to his occupation and date of injury of April of 2005."
Id.
On September 12, 2007, the claimant returned to Dr. Glenney and
said he was "fed up," Claimant's Exhibit A, with the pain in his left shoulder
and wanted to undergo the surgery recommended by Dr. Glenney at a previous
office visit on May 18, 2006. In correspondence to respondent...
To continue reading
Request your trial