54 Van Natta 275 (2002). JEFFREY R. JOHNSON, Claimant.
Case Date | May 07, 2002 |
Court | Oregon |
Oregon Worker Compensation
2002.
54 Van Natta 275 (2002).
JEFFREY R. JOHNSON, Claimant
275In the Matter of the Compensation of JEFFREY
R. JOHNSON, ClaimantWCB Case No. 00-05792ORDER ON REVIEW (REMANDING)Willner Wren Hill and Uren, Claimant
AttorneysJohnson Nyburg
and Andersen, Defense AttorneysReviewing Panel: Members Biehl and Lowell.Claimant requests review of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
Crummé's order that dismissed his request for hearing. On review, the
issue is the propriety of the dismissal order. We vacate and remand. FINDINGS OF FACT Pursuant to
claimant's request, a hearing was scheduled on June 28, 2001. Neither claimant nor an attorney representing claimant
appeared at the hearing. The insurer moved for
dismissal. The ALJ issued an Order of Dismissal on July 5, 2001. The Order of Dismissal contained a notice of the right to
request Board review. The order also contained a
statement that claimant had the right, within the 30 day appeal period, to
request that the ALJ reconsider the order. The
notice provided that if claimant could show good cause for his failure to
appear at the hearing within the 30-day appeal period, the order would be set
aside. In a letter dated August 3, 2001, claimant's
new attorney wrote the ALJ explaining that counsel for the insurer had informed
him that an Order of Dismissal had been issued in the case. The letter stated
that it was a "formal appeal" of the dismissal. The letter also requested
copies of the Notice of Hearing and the dismissal order. The letter further
stated that, when the dismissal order and Notice of Hearing were received, a
detailed argument for reinstatement of the case would be submitted. The letter
was received by the Board on August 6, 2001 and was treated as a request for
Board review.1 1 Here, the 30th day after the ALJ's
dismissal order fell on Saturday, August 4, 2001. When the last day of the
30-day appeal period falls on a Saturday or a legal holiday, the appeal period
runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday or legal holiday.
See, e.g., Sandy K. Preuss, 50 Van Natta 1028 (1998);
James D. Hill, 49 Van Natta 308 (1997). 54 Van Natta 275 (2002)276CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION An ALJ must
consider a motion for postponement of a hearing even after an order of
dismissal has been issued. See Olga G. Semeniuk, 46 Van Natta
152 (1994); Harold...
To continue reading
Request your trial