5406 CRB-4-08-12 (2009). Kummer v. BIC Corporation.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2009.
5406 CRB-4-08-12 (2009).
Kummer v. BIC Corporation
CASE NO. 5406 CRB-4-08-12COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DECEMBER 15, 2009NANCY KUMMER CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v. BIC CORPORATION EMPLOYER and
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY INSURER RESPONDENTS-APPELLEESAPPEARANCES: The claimant appeared pro
se. The respondents were represented by Joseph J. Passaretti, Jr., Esq.,
Montstream and May, 655 Winding Brook Drive, P.O. Box 1087, Glastonbury, CT
06033-6087. This Petition for Review from the November 25, 2008 Finding and
Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District was heard on May
29, 2009 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission
Chairman John A. Mastropietro and Commissioners Peter C. Mlynarczyk and Randy
L. Cohen.OPINIONJOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN. The claimant
has petitioned for review from the November 25, 2008 Finding and Dismissal of
the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District. We find no error, and
accordingly affirm the decision of the trial commissioner.The following factual background is pertinent to our review. The
claimant alleges she sustained a compensable back injury on June 27, 1997 while
in the employ of the respondent employer as a mold helper, which position
entailed providing materials to the machine operators. The claimant testified
that on the date of injury, she was pulling a wagon filled with cartridges that
weighed more than 600 pounds when the wagon got caught on a
"paddy-pal." The claimant tried to pull the wagon free, and felt
her back "go out." Findings, ¶ 3.
The claimant testified that she informed the union steward of the
incident but was unable to inform the company nurse because she had already
left for the day. The claimant stated that because her coworkers'
vacation schedules overlapped with her own, she was unable to inform the
company nurse about the injury until sometime in September 1997. A daily
medical log maintained by the respondent employer indicated the claimant first
reported low back pain on August 29, 1997 but did not attribute it to a
specific injury or incident. A second medical log entry dated September 22,
1997 indicated the claimant reported both low back and left hand pain at that
time but only provided a history of how the pain in the hand occurred. At
trial, the claimant confirmed the medical log entries were accurate. A First
Report of Injury was filed on February 2, 1998 and the claimant filed an
Accident/Incident Investigation report on February 13, 1998.
The claimant submitted into evidence a report dated September 23,
1998 from S.J. Hochman, D.C., a chiropractor, who indicated he had been
treating the claimant for lumbar complaints during the time period between
August 18, 1997 and September 23, 1998. Claimant's Exhibit A. In this
report, Dr. Hochman opined, "there is a direct causal relationship
between the work related accident of June 27, 1997 and Ms. Kummer's
subsequent injuries and impairment." Id. Dr. Hochman assigned the
claimant a seven-percent disability rating to her lumbar spine. The claimant
also treated with Cynthia Relihan, M.D., for complaints associated with the
left upper extremity. In her report of September 25, 1997, Dr. Relihan stated
the claimant's past medical history was "unremarkable."
Respondents' Exhibit 4. On December 9, 1997, the claimant saw B.L.
Sprague, M.D., for treatment of her right hand. In this report, in the section
entitled "medical problems," Dr. Sprague reported
"none." Respondents' Exhibit 3. At the request of the
respondents, on July 20, 1998, the claimant underwent a Respondents'
Medical Examination with James V. Lettera, M.D., for an evaluation of her left
hand. In his report of that date, Dr. Lettera indicated the claimant's
"previous history is unremarkable other than for smoking."
Respondents' Exhibit 2.
On December 16, 2003, the claimant consulted Scott Waller, M.D.,
for a lumbar complaint. At that time, Dr. Waller opined the claimant's
symptoms could be attributed to "a combination of left side sacroiliitis
as well as being due to lumbosacral degenerative arthritis with an associated
grade I spondylolisthesis of L4 on L5 and with possible left sided nerve root
encroachment." Respondents' Exhibit 1. On March 23, 2004, Dr.
Waller reported "[t]he patient's lower back and left lower
extremity symptoms have almost completely resolved with conservative
management." Id. Dr. Waller discharged the claimant from his care and
did not assign an impairment rating.
On the basis of the foregoing, the trial commissioner dismissed
the claimant's lumbar spine claim, concluding that the claimant, whom he
did not find credible or persuasive, had failed to sustain her burden of proof.
The trial commissioner also indicated he found the medical opinions of Drs.
Waller, Lettera, Relihan and Sprague credible and persuasive.
On December 15, 2008, the claimant filed a Motion to Correct the
Finding and Dismissal indicating it was her understanding that the issue for
discussion at the formal hearing was supposed to have been her low back claim
and because the respondents had filed exhibits pertaining to her claim for an
injury to her left hand, she was seeking corrections to Findings
¶¶10, 11 and 12. Along with this Motion to Correct, the claimant also
filed a timely Petition for Review and additional correspondence indicating she
was appealing the trial decision "on the fact that we were on the wrong
body part and Claim #112 [sic] is the low Back Claim only." On December
23, 2008, the trial commissioner issued a ruling on the claimant's
Motion to Correct in which he denied the proposed corrections but...
To continue reading
Request your trial