5422 CRB-2-09-2 (2010). Gibson v. State of Connecticut Department of Developmental Services - North Region.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2010.
5422 CRB-2-09-2 (2010).
Gibson v. State of Connecticut Department of Developmental Services - North Region
CASE NO. 5422 CRB-2-09-2COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONJANUARY 13, 2010SUSAN GIBSON CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. STATE OF
CONNECTICUT/DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES-NORTH REGION EMPLOYER
SELF-INSURED RESPONDENT-APPELLANT and GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA ADMINISTRATOR
APPEARANCES: The
claimant was represented by Anthony Feit, Esq., Attorney at Law, 4-B New London
Turnpike, Suite 6, Glastonbury, CT 06033. The respondent was represented by
Lawrence G. Widem, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney
General, 55 Elm Street, P.O. Box 120, Hartford, CT 06141-0120. This Petition
for Review from the January 28, 2009 Finding and Dismissal of the Commissioner
acting for the Second District was heard July 24, 2009 before a Compensation
Review Board panel consisting of the Commission Chairman John A. Mastropietro
and Commissioners Randy L. Cohen and Stephen B. Delaney. OPINIONJOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN. This
appeal is based on a single issue: did the trial commissioner err in dismissing
the respondent's claim that they were entitled to reimbursement from the
claimant for an overpayment? Upon reviewing the evidence presented at the
hearing we conclude the trial commissioner had a sufficient basis to find the
respondent's arguments and evidence unpersuasive. We therefore affirm the
decision of the trial commissioner and dismiss this appeal.
A rather convoluted series of events predated the commissioner's
ruling in this matter. The claimant was injured in the 1980's while in the
employ of the respondent. On August 28, 1989 a voluntary agreement was approved
between the claimant and the respondent for those injuries. The agreement
called for the payment of permanent partial disability benefits of 5% for the
cervical spine; 7.5% for the lumbar spine and 5% for the left hand attributed
to those injuries. Those injuries were stated as having occurred on February
24, 1987. The voluntary agreement stated a maximum medical improvement date of
March 8, 1988. In the Finding and Dismissal at issue, the trial commissioner
noted that the voluntary agreement had "a distinct tear at the upper left
corner of the document consistent with stapled attachments, but the attachments
are no longer present." Findings, ¶ 1.
The claimant moved on June 12, 2008 to reopen the voluntary
agreement, arguing the voluntary agreement is defective as to the maximum
medical improvement date reflected. She argued that as she was not represented
by counsel at the time the voluntary agreement was approved in 1989, it should
be reopened. The respondent filed a timely objection to this motion.
A formal hearing was held on August 4, 2008 wherein the claimant
testified that she was assisted by a union representative at the time she
signed the voluntary agreement. She said she had been told by the commissioner
hearing her case that day that she should sign the agreement. She also
testified that she had been represented by counsel for one purpose; the
attorney obtained a full and final stipulation with the respondent for a foot
injury. The trial commissioner took administrative notice of a stipulation in
the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) dated April 16, 1993 and approved
by the workers' compensation...
To continue reading
Request your trial