5424 CRB-7-09-2 (2010). Ouelette v. New England Masonry Company.
Court | Connecticut |
Connecticut Workers Compensation
2010.
5424 CRB-7-09-2 (2010).
Ouelette v. New England Masonry Company
CASE NO. 5424
CRB-7-09-2COMPENSATION REVIEW
BOARD
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONJANUARY 14, 2010HENRY OUELLETTE CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v.
NEW ENGLAND MASONRY COMPANY EMPLOYER and AIG CLAIMS SERVICES INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES APPEARANCES: The claimant was represented by Ross T. Lessack,
Esq., The Dodd Law Firm, LLC, Ten Corporate Center, 1781 Highland Avenue, Suite
105, Cheshire, CT 06410. The respondents were represented by Lynn M. Raccio,
Esq., Law Offices of Jack V. Genovese II, 200 Glastonbury Boulevard, Suite 301,
Glastonbury, CT 06033. This Petition for Review from the January 26, 2009
Finding and Award of the Commissioner acting for the Seventh District was heard
July 24, 2009 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the
Commission Chairman John A. Mastropietro and Commissioners Peter C. Mlynarczyk
and Randy L. Cohen. OPINIONJOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN. This
appeal requires us to resolve a single question. Did the trial commissioner err
in determining that the respondents were entitled to a 20% credit against the
claimant's present 32.5% permanency rating? The claimant argues that he did not
receive sufficient monetary compensation against the permanent partial
disability rating he received after his first injury. Therefore, the claimant
believes there should be a smaller credit applied against what the respondent
is obligated to pay for permanent partial disability after the subsequent
injury. We have reviewed the claimant's pleadings and the law governing this
issue. We conclude that the trial commissioner's decision is consistent with
the evidence presented and the precedent on this issue. There is no error and
the Finding and Award is herein affirmed.
The following facts are pertinent to our consideration of this
matter. The claimant has sustained a number of compensable back injuries; two
injuries incurred in 1999 and a subsequent injury which occurred on February
11, 2003. Prior to the more recent injury, the claimant and the respondent
settled the claims for the initial injuries via a Stipulation to Date dated
February 6, 2002. This stipulation called for the claimant to receive the sum
of $37,500 as compensation for his prior injuries. The stipulation also recited
the claimant's position that he had sustained a 20% permanent partial
disability to his low back as a result of the compensable injuries.
During the formal hearing on the present claim, the claimant
asserted that he had received $12,889.32 for temporary total disability
benefits from the $37,500 award, leaving a balance against the permanency award
of $24,600.68. The claimant stated that his compensation rate at the time was
$584.20 and based on this rate he had received 41.94 weeks of permanency
benefits. He stated that a 20% permanency rating for the lower back entitled
him to a considerably longer period of benefits and that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial