Giles v. State, Dep't of Transp., 010699 MNWC,

Case DateJanuary 06, 1999
CourtMinnesota
MYRNA J. GILES, Employee,
v.
STATE, DEP'T OF TRANSP., SELF-INSURED, Employer/Appellant.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
January 6, 1999
         HEADNOTES          WITHDRAWAL FROM LABOR MARKET - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence supports the compensation judge's determination that the employee did not withdraw from the labor market by moving from the Twin Cities to Albert Lea where the employee obtained employment within two months after moving to Albert Lea, has maintained employment since, and cooperated with rehabilitation services in conducting a job search.          EARNING CAPACITY - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence supports the compensation judge's determination that the employee's post-layoff earnings in Albert Lea are an accurate reflection of her present earning capacity where the sole evidence rebutting the employee's claim was evidence of jobs available in the metropolitan area prior to her move to Albert Lea.          Affirmed.           Determined by Johnson, J., Wheeler, J., and Wilson, J.           Compensation Judge: Kathleen Nicol Behounek           OPINION           THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Judge          The self-insured employer appeals from the compensation judge's finding that the employee proved a loss of earning capacity causally related to her personal injury and from the judge's consequent award of temporary partial disability benefits. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          Myrna Giles, the employee, injured her back on January 27, 1988, while working for the self-insured employer, Minnesota Department of Transportation. The employee was paid $10.92 an hour and her weekly wage was $436.80. The self-insured employer accepted liability for the employee's personal injury. The employee suffers from degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine as a result of her work injury. She has permanent restrictions on her work activities which preclude her return to her pre-injury job as a highway maintenance worker. In 1989, the parties settled the employee's claim for a 10.5 percent whole body disability. An award on stipulation was filed on December 7, 1989.          The employee was born and raised in Albert Lea, Minnesota. She is currently 62 years of age. She attended Mankato State University and graduated with a degree in music education in 1967. (T. 16.) Some time thereafter, she completed a course in offset printing at Austin Community College. (T. 17.) The employee has a varied work history. After graduation from college, she worked as a music teacher in Elkton and New Richland, Minnesota, from 1968 through 1972. (T. 19-20.) Between 1973 and 1975 the employee worked for the State of Minnesota, Department of Welfare. (T. 20.) The employee did not work from 1975 through 1979. From 1979 through 1981 she was the dog catcher for the City of Albert Lea. In 1981, the employee went to work for Brown Printing in Waseca, Minnesota. The employee injured her right shoulder after two days and did not return to work at Brown. (T. 21.) From 1982 through 1984 the employee worked for Rehbein Construction Company. The first summer she worked in St. Paul, Minnesota, and the second in Montana. (T. 21-22.) From 1985 to 1986, the employee worked part-time at Naeve Hospital in Albert Lea, Minnesota, as a home health care aide. (T. 22.) On November 12, 1986, the employee was hired as a highway maintenance worker by the employer where she worked until her injury on January 27, 1988. (T. 23.)          The employee was unable to return to her job as a maintenance worker after her work injury. The employer initially transferred the employee to its offices in Owatonna, Minnesota, where she performed light-duty clerical work. Several months later, the employee was transferred to the Department of Finance in St. Paul, Minnesota. She worked as a clerk for the department from approximately November 1988 through November 1995. It is undisputed the clerk job was within the employee's physical restrictions.  The employee's earnings with the Department of Finance exceeded her pre-injury wage. (T. 108-109.) During this period, the employee commuted from her home in Nerstrand, Minnesota, to her office in St. Paul, a trip of approximately 45 minutes. (T. 26.) The employee also owned a house in Albert Lea, Minnesota, which she rented to tenants. (T. 15.)          In early September 1995, the Department of Finance notified the employee she would be laid off effective November 11, 1995. The employee was formally advised by the State of Minnesota Department of Finance of the layoff by letter dated October 11, 1995. The letter further explained the employee's rights to "claim" vacant positions in other state agencies. (Resp. Ex. 3.) The letter stated, in part:
Article 15 of the AFSCME, Council 6, Bargaining Agreement, describes the procedures for handling layoffs. Of the options described in Article 15, none within our department are available to you at this time. Unless circumstances change your layoff will be effective the close of the workday November 14, 1995. The length of the layoff is indefinite.
As an employee facing layoff, you have the right to "claim" vacant positions at an equal or lower level in other state agencies for which you are determined to be qualified. You can schedule advisory testing through me or the Department of Employee Relations in order to determine if you are qualified for any positions that may be available. I have requested a list of open requisitions from the Department of Employee Relations so you will have the opportunity to claim any positions that may be available. I should receive the first list on Monday or Tuesday of next week.
         The employee acknowledged she was aware of her claiming rights under the union contract. (T. 58-59.)          Deb Patrin, a personnel executive with the Department of Finance, testified at the hearing.1 Her job duties included assisting employees with transitions to new jobs after layoffs. Ms. Patrin began working with the employee before her November 11, 1995 layoff. Ms. Patrin personally met with the employee...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT