LaDouceur v. State, Dep't of Transp., 012599 MNWC,

Case DateJanuary 25, 1999
CourtMinnesota
DARRELL LaDOUCEUR, Employee/Appellant,
v.
STATE, DEP'T OF TRANSP., SELF-INSURED, and HARTFORD INS. CO., Intervenor.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
January 25, 1999
         HEADNOTES          CAUSATION - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence, including expert medical opinion, supported the compensation judge's conclusion that the employee's sleep disorder was not causally related to his work accident.          Affirmed.           Determined by Wilson, J., Pederson, J., and Hefte, J.           Compensation Judge: Donald C. Erickson.           OPINION           DEBRA A. WILSON, Judge          The employee appeals from the compensation judge's finding that the employee's sleep disorder is not causally related to his work-related motor vehicle accident. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          The employee began work for the State of Minnesota [the self-insured employer] in 1982. From 1986 to 1996 the employee worked in the Department of Transportation as a highway maintenance worker. During the winter months, snow removal was his primary job responsibility.          On March 24, 1996, the employee was involved in a work-related accident when the snowplow he was operating rolled over and slid into a ditch on its top. The employee ended up suspended upside down from his seatbelt, but he does not recall receiving a blow or strike to his head. A passerby assisted the employee in exiting the truck and drove him to Mercy Hospital in Moose Lake, where he was treated for a left shoulder injury and released. Two days later, the employee treated with his family physician, Dr. Kenneth Etterman, who diagnosed "cervical, shoulder, upper back and lumbar sprain-strain." Dr. Etterman's notes on April 9, 1996, reflect that the employee continued to have pain and that his "[s]leep is disturbed as well." On April 18, 1996, Dr. Etterman noted that the employee's sleep was disturbed at night and that the employee had to nap during the day. The employee was treated with physical therapy, medication, and exercises. Thereafter, the employee had persistent complaints of pain in the thoracic and lumbar spine, with involuntary muscle tightness in the thoracic spine, tightness of the paralumbar muscles, and reduced range of lumbar motion. An MRI taken on June 2, 1997, confirmed degenerative changes at L4-5 and L5-S1, which had earlier appeared on x-rays.          The employee was off work from the time of the injury until June 18, 1996, when he returned to work on a light-duty, part-time work-hardening basis, cleaning the edge drains along freeways. The employee testified that his back was extremely sore while performing this job and that he "couldn't stay awake." He also testified to difficulty staying awake while driving. The employee was restricted to working four hours per day, three days per week on September 13, 1996, and four hours per day, five days per week on November 5, 1996, by Dr. Peter R. Hindle. Some time thereafter, the employer provided work for the employee in Duluth, an hour's drive from the employee's home. The employee would drive one hour to work, work two hours, and then drive an hour home.          The employee began treating with Dr. Jed Downs, an occupational medicine specialist, on February 7, 1997, and on March 4, 1997, Dr. Downs recorded that the employee had concerns of falling asleep behind...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT