Mulgrew v. City & Borough of Juneau, 030221 AKWC, 21-0020

Case DateMarch 02, 2021
CourtAlaska
LAURA MULGREW, Employee, Claimant,
v.
CITY & BOROUGH OF JUNEAU, Self-Insured Employer, Defendant
AWCB Decision No. 21-0020
AWCB No. 201802000
Alaska Workers Compensation Board
March 2, 2021
          FINAL DECISION AND ORDER           Kathryn Setzer, Designated Chair.          Laura Mulgrew’s (Employee) May 28, 2020 claim was heard on January 26, 2021 in Juneau, Alaska, a date selected on November 25, 2020. A November 10, 2020 affidavit of readiness for hearing gave rise to this hearing. Attorney Robert Bredesen appeared in-person and represented Employee, who appeared in-person and testified. Attorney Colby Smith appeared telephonically and represented City & Borough of Juneau (Employer). The record remained open to receive Employee’s supplemental attorney’s fees and costs affidavit and Employer’s response and closed on February 5, 2021.          ISSUES          Employee contends physical and massage therapy enables her to continue working and relieves chronic debilitating pain. She contends the substantial compliance doctrine applies to AS 23.30.095(c) and 8 AAC 45.082 because they are “affirmative” rather than “prohibitive.” Employee contends her medical provider substantially complied with the treatment plan requirements under AS 23.30.095(c). She contends Employer was not prejudiced by her medical provider’s failure to provide the treatment plan within 14 days after treatment exceeding the frequency limitations began and to require strict compliance would produce a harsh result. Employee contends AS 23.30.095(a) provides broad authority to authorize ongoing future medical treatment, including ongoing physical and massage therapy in excess of the treatment frequency standards. She contends ongoing physical and massage therapy is reasonable and necessary to enable her to continue working and relieve chronic debilitating pain. Employee requests orders awarding past medical bills for physical and massage therapy and authorizing further physical and massage therapy in excess of the treatment frequency guidelines.          Employer contends past physical and massage therapy was not reasonable or necessary. It contends Employee was able to and continued to work without it. Employer contends Employee’s medical provider exceeded the frequency limitations under AS 23.30.095(c) and failed to comply to provide a treatment plan within 14 days after treatment commenced. It contends ongoing physical and massage therapy is not reasonable or necessary. Employer requests an order denying past and continuing physical and massage therapy.          1) Is Employee entitled to past and continuing physical and massage therapy?          Employee contends she is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs. She requests an award of attorney’s fees and costs.          Employer contends Employee is not entitled to past or continuing physical and massage therapy. It requests an order denying attorney’s fees and costs.          2) Is Employee entitled to attorney’s fees and costs?          FINDINGS OF FACT          A preponderance of the evidences establishes the following facts and factual conclusions:          1) On October 17, 2017, Employee reported right ankle pain after a student kicked her and she rolled her ankle. (Frank Mesdag, D.P.M., chart note, October 17, 2017).          2) On December 28, 2017, Employee was released to return to work with no restrictions. (Mesdag, Physician’s Report, December 28, 2017).          3) On February 6, 2018, Employer reported a student repeatedly stomped on Employee’s right foot on February 2, 2018. (First Report of Occupational Injury or Illness, February 6, 2018).          4) On February 9, 2018, Employee said her right foot and ankle pain never went away after the October 2017 injury. She reported the same student stomped on her right foot on February 2, 2018, and she had throbbing right foot pain. Employee’s right foot was swollen and she had moderate synovitis along the lateral aspect of her right ankle when compared to the left. She was put in a Cam Walker. (William Martin, III, M.D., chart note, February 9, 2018).          5) On March 6, 2018, Employee reported continued but improved right foot pain. Her foot was moderately swollen and she around her right foot and ankle. Dr. Martin ordered a right foot MRI. (Martin chart note, March 6, 2018).          6) On March 7, 2018, a right foot MRI showed a chronic plantar plate tear at the second metatarsophalangeal joint with hypertrophic scarring and shallow stripping of the plantar lateral capsule from the phalangeal base and adjacent mild subcutaneous and phalangeal base edema, medial subluxation of the phalangeal base form capsular insufficiency, diffuse scarring with thickening of the medial collateral ligament at the first metatarsophalangeal join, varus angulation at the first metatarsal, mild arthrosis at the first metatarsophalangeal joint with marginal chondral thinning and spurring, and hammertoe deformities from the second through the fifth toes. (MRI report, March 7, 2018).          7) On March 13, 2018, Dr. Martin diagnosed a chronic plantar plate tear involving the second metatarsophalangeal joint with hypertrophic scarring and shallow stripping of the plantar lateral capsule which correlated well with where Employee’s pain was located. Dr. Martin added Hapads to her shoes on top of her orthotics and recommended she wear stiff soled shoes. (Martin chart note, March 13, 2018).          8) On April 12, 2018, Dr. Martin performed a corticosteroid injection into Employee’s plantar aspect of her right second metatarsophalangeal joint. (Martin chart note, April 12, 2018).          9) On August 21, 2018, Dr. Martin referred Employee to Eric Heit, M.D., for a plantar plate surgery. (Martin chart note, August 21, 2018).          10) On November 28, 2018, Dr. Heit performed a plantar plate repair of the second metatarsophalangeal joint and a hammertoe correction with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer of the right second toe. (Heit operative report, November 28, 2018).          11) On December 6, 2018, a right lower extremity ultrasound revealed a deep vein thrombosis. (Ultrasound report, December 6, 2018).          12) On February 11, 2019, Dr. Heit recommended physical therapy for Employee’s right foot and ankle pain secondary to a second metatarsophalangeal joint plantar plate repair and hammertoe correction surgery on November 28, 2018. (Heit therapy referral, February 11, 2019).          13) On May 20, 2019, Robert Waltz, M.D, an orthopedic surgeon, examined Employee for an Employer’s Medical Evaluation (EME) and observed a slight subtle antalgic gain with decreased stance phase on the right compared to the left, her second toe had an approximately 20 degree slightly lateral deviated deformity and it touched her third toe without overlap, a neutral alignment of her great toe without residual hallux valgus deformity, and slight asymmetric swelling in the right ankle and forefoot compared to the left. Her second toe demonstrated metatarsophalangeal joint motion of neutral flexion to 30 degrees extension; intact active flexion and extension; her second toe proximal interphalangeal joint was completely ankylosed without any motion and her second toe distal interphalangeal joint demonstrated zero degrees of extension to 20 degrees of flexion. Employee reported her right foot throbbed and swelled at the end of the day; her foot and toes were achy and stiff, she could not sit or stand as long as she could prior to the injury, limitations with squatting, gardening and home improvement projects. Dr. Waltz diagnosed a preexisting right foot second toe plantar plate rupture permanently aggravated by the work injury, a work-related right foot contusion and crush injury, a preexisting right foot hammertoe deformity from the second through fifth digits permanently aggravated by the work injury and a work-related right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis related to the surgical treatment of the second toe plantar plate and flexor digitorum longus transfer. He recommended ongoing physical therapy to improve her overall gait and her second toe function and manual therapy, ankle range of motion therapy and strengthening of her right lower extremity two times per week for eight weeks. (Waltz EME report, May 20, 2019).          14) On November 18, 2019, Dr. Heit recommended physical therapy for Employee’s chronic right foot and ankle pain two times per week for eight weeks. (Heit therapy referral, November 18, 2019).          15) On December 6, 2019, Dr. Waltz examined Employee for a second EME and observed her...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT