AGO 661-07-00-.
Case Date | September 20, 2006 |
Court | Alaska |
Alaska Attorney General Opinions
2006.
AGO 661-07-00-.
MEMORANDUMState of AlaskaDepartment
of LawDATE: September 20,
2006File No.
661-07-00--TO:
Designated Ethics SupervisorFROM: Judy
BockmonAssistant Attorney GeneralTEL.
NO.:269-5216FAX: 279-2834SUBJECT: Ethics Advice: Outside Employment
DisclosureWe have review the outside employment disclosure form and related
information provided by e-mail by Employee and considered your concern
regarding whether her employment as a consultant by Company is in conflict with
the proper discharge of her state duties. As you know, I also talked to
Employee regarding her disclosures prior to your forwarding them to me.
We understand that Employee is employed by Agency as a public
information officer. She serves as the point of contact for inquiries from
citizens, the media, other state officials, the legislature and members of the
congressional delegation. She prepares the agency newsletter and may on
occasion represent the agency at meetings with business or other governmental
representatives and make public appearances on behalf of the agency.
My research reflects that Employee is the sole proprietor of a
private business. State online licensing records indicate that the business
provides administrative, support, waste management, and remediation services.
Employee did not identify her business by name in her outside employment
disclosure. She listed Company as a client to whom she provides these same
services. She also listed Organization as a client for which she does
fundraising. She further disclosed that she may do political fundraising. It is
not clear from the disclosure whether she undertakes the latter for
compensation. The disclosure form requires an employee to explain why no
potential conflict exists between disclosed outside employment and her official
duties, if the employee's outside job duties are the same as or similar to her
state service or if in the outside job, the employee deals with people or
entities with whom she deals as part of her official duties. Employee noted:
"No conflict - not same duties, no oil & gas @ [Agency] or solid waste; no
vet or animal research; no fundraising."
Finally, there is also a question regarding whether certain
compensation for travel Employee received was a gift subject to disclosure
under the Ethics Act.
GENERAL LEGAL STANDARDS RELEVANT TO OUTSIDE
EMPLOYMENT
In enacting the Executive Branch Ethics Act, AS 39.52, the
legislature recognized that public officers retain their rights to personal and
financial interests and may follow independent pursuits so long as these
interests and pursuits do not interfere with the public officer's full and
faithful discharge of his or her state duties.(fn1) The Act prohibits a public
employee from outside employment or service that "is incompatible or in
conflict with the proper discharge of official duties."(fn2) Thus, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial