AGO 84-6.
Case Date | April 02, 1984 |
Court | Colorado |
Colorado Attorney General Opinions
1984.
AGO 84-6.
April 2, 1984Department of Law
Attorney General Opinion FORMAL OPINION
of DUANE WOODARD
Attorney General Opinion No. 84-6
AG Alpha No. LE HR AGAMY
Honorable Jerry Kopel
Colorado House of Representatives
Denver, Colorado
80203
RE: H.B. 1108 (1984 session)Dear Representative Kopel:
I am writing in response to your March 26, 1984 letter requesting
an attorney general's opinion on whether H.B. 1108 (1984 session), in either
its original or reengrossed revised form, violates article V, sections 17 and
21 of the Colorado Constitution.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED AND CONCLUSIONS
Whether section 7 of the original version of H.B. 1108 violates
article V, section 21 of the Colorado Constitution?
Whether H.B. 1108, in its reengrossed revised form, violates
artice V, section 21 of the Colorado Constitution?
Whether the original purpose of the bill was amended or altered
by the Senate in violation of article V, section 17 of the Colorado
Constitution?
As to each of these questions, my conclusion is "no."
ANALYSIS
The title of H.B. 1108, as originally introduced and at the
present time, is "A Bill for an Act Concerning Mandatory Motor Vehicle
Insurance." The bill was extensively amended on the Senate floor on March 16,
1984. The original bill: (1) amended various statutory provisions relating to
the effect of the mandatory motor vehicle insurance requirement on motor
vehicle registration, renewal, and cancellation procedures; (2) provided
sanctions for the false affirmation of the existence of insurance; and (3)
added a provision to the automobile policy regulations, sections 10-4-601 to
609, C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.), to prohibit, under certain circumstances,
the nonrenewal of an automobile insurance policy. In addition, the original
version of the bill amended the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act,
sections 10-4-701 to 723, C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.), to extend the payment
period for lost income or essential services benefits. The March 16 Senate
amendments not only further revised the motor vehicle registration procedures
and requirements, but made additional changes relating to mandatory insurance
coverage and benefits and increased the monetary threshold limitation on tort
actions against persons covered by such insurance.
(I & II)
Article V, section 21, of the Colorado Constitution reads, in...
To continue reading
Request your trial