Alfstad v. Second Injury Fund of Iowa, 031120 IAWC, 5058197

Case DateMarch 11, 2020
CourtIowa
MICHAEL ALFSTAD, Claimant
v.
SECOND INJURY FUND OF IOWA, Defendant.
No. 5058197
Iowa Workers Compensation
Before the Iowa Workers' Compensation Commissioner
March 11, 2020
         Head Note Nos. 1803, 1803.1, 3202           ARBITRATION DECISION           JAMES F. ELLIOTT, DEPUTY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER          STATEMENT OF THE CASE          Michael Alfstad, claimant, filed a petition in arbitration seeking workers’ compensation benefits from the Second Injury Fund of Iowa (Fund) as a result of an injury he sustained on February 23, 2016 that arose out of and in the course of his employment. Claimant also alleged a first qualifying injury of January 1, 2003. This case was heard in Des Moines, Iowa on February 4, 2020 and fully submitted on March 2, 2020. The evidence in this case consists of the testimony of claimant, Joint Exhibits 1 - 8, Defendant’s Exhibits AA, BB and Claimant’s Exhibits 1 – 5. Claimant submitted a brief. The Fund declined to file a brief. (Transcript page 57)          The parties filed a hearing report at the commencement of the arbitration hearing. On the hearing report, the parties entered into various stipulations. All of those stipulations were accepted and are hereby incorporated into this arbitration decision and no factual or legal issues relative to the parties’ stipulations will be raised or discussed in this decision. The parties are now bound by their stipulations. The Fund and claimant stipulated claimant had a second qualifying injury to the right lower extremity, assuming claimant proved a first qualifying injury. (Hearing Report p. 3; Tr. p. 6) The parties stipulated that any Fund benefits would commence on August 27, 2018 and the Fund is entitled to a credit for the first and second qualifying injuries of 115 weeks. (Hearing Report p. 3; Tr. pp. 6,7)          ISSUES          Whether claimant sustained a first qualifying injury on January 1, 2003, and if so;          The extent of claimant’s disability for the first injury.          The extent of claimant’s disability for his February 23, 2016 injury.          Assessment of costs.          FINDINGS OF FACT          The deputy workers’ compensation commissioner, having heard the testimony and considered the evidence in the record, finds that:          Michael Alfstad, claimant, was 47 years old at the time of the hearing. Claimant graduated from high school. Claimant did not go to college. Claimant entered and completed a four-year carpenter’s apprentice program. Claimant was a union carpenter and worked as a union carpenter for over 20 years. As a union carpenter, claimant worked for a No. of employers over the years. (See, Exhibit 1, p. 3) The work he did as a carpenter was similar in all of his jobs. Claimant would work overhead, use ladders and scaffolding, lift heavy weights – up to 150 pounds, was on his feet all day and would use hand and power tools.          Prior to his work as a carpenter, claimant was an assistant deli manager at a grocery store. As an assistant manager claimant would be on his feet all day and would have to carry and move trays of food. (Tr. p. 13)          In 2003 claimant began experiencing symptoms in his right wrist. On August 1 2003, Gary Jassen, D.O. examined claimant before his right wrist surgery on that same day. Dr. Jassen wrote,
Patient is a thirty-one year-old white male with a history of right wrist pain for several months. At that time he was working at an employer called Kennedy and thought the problem came from repetitive use of the extremity, carrying lumber, cutting with shears and scissors, etc. He was treated conservatively without improvement of his symptoms and was seen by Dr. Misol, who recommended surgical release of the tendon, felt he would benefit from the procedure.
(JE 1, p. 1) On August 1, 2003, Sinesio Misol, M.D. performed right wrist surgery. On August 11, 2003, Dr. Misol said that claimant was, “. . . post tenosynovitis of deQuervain’s release of right wrist on 08/01/03. He is doing well.” (JE 2, p. 5) Claimant testified that he did not recall if he had any additional treatment for his right wrist. Claimant testified that he still has symptoms in his right wrist related to the deQuervain’s release surgery. Claimant has numbness and has lost grip strength and strength in his right hand/arm. Claimant testified that he compensated for his right upper extremity symptoms by using his left hand/arm more. (Tr. pp. 22, 23)          On July 26, 2019, Sunil Bansal, M.D. examined claimant concerning his right wrist. Dr. Bansal stated claimant had a permanent impairment to his right wrist. Dr. Bansal wrote claimant had “Right wrist deQuervain’s tenosynovitis” and was “[s]tatus post right wrist deQuervain’s release.” (JE 8, p. 77) Dr. Bansal assigned a two percent impairment rating using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition. Dr. Bansal recommended a 20 pound lifting restriction for the right hand. (JE 8, p. 78)          I find claimant has a permanent impairment as a result of his January 1, 2003 cumulative...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT