Anderson v. Finley Engineering Co., Inc., 032620 SDWC, 22, 2016/17

Case DateMarch 26, 2020
CourtSouth Dakota
CALVIN P. ANDERSON, Claimant,
v.
FINLEY ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC, Employer,
and
THE HARTFORD, Insurer.
HF No. 22, 2016/17
South Dakota Workers Compensation
Dakota Department of Labor & Regulation Division of Labor and Management
March 26, 2020
         DECISION           Joe Thronson, Administrative Law Judge.          This is a workers’ compensation case brought before the South Dakota Department of Labor & Regulation, Division of Labor and Management pursuant to SDCL 62-7-12 and ARSD 47:03:01. The case was heard by Joseph Thronson, Administrative Law Judge, on November 12, 2019, in Pierre, South Dakota. Claimant, Calvin Anderson, appeared pro se. Employer, Finley Engineering Company, Inc., and Insurer, The Hartford, were represented by Richard Travis of May & Johnson, P.C.          ISSUE PRESENTED          I. DOES RES JUDICATA BAR CLAIMANT FROM RECEIVING WORKERS COMPENSATION BENEFITS IN SOUTH DAKOTA?          II. HAS CLAIMANT MET HIS BURDEN OF PROVING HIS INJURY REMAINS A MAJOR CONTRIBUTING CAUSE OF HIS DISABILITY?          FACTS          Claimant, Calvin P. Anderson suffered a workplace injury on January 19, 2005 while employed by Finley Engineering. Finley is a company based in North Dakota. At the time of the injury, Claimant was also a resident of North Dakota. On the date of injury, Claimant was working near Ipswich, South Dakota as a field inspector. He slipped on an icy driveway and suffered an injury to his right shoulder and left hip. Claimant reported his injury to North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance (WSI), the agency responsible for handling workers’ compensation cases in that state. WSI accepted Claimant’s injury as compensable and began paying benefits for his right shoulder and left hip. WSI continued to pay Claimant benefits and provide treatment for his injuries until April 2010 when it sent Claimant notice that it was discontinuing the payment of benefits for his hip. WSI determined that Claimant had a preexisting arthritic condition at the time of his injury and his fall was therefore not a major contributing cause of his condition. In June 2010, a rehabilitation specialist hired by WSI noted...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT