Balma v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. #11, 050699 MNWC,

Case DateMay 06, 1999
CourtMinnesota
MICHAEL A. BALMA, Employee/Appellant
v.
ANOKA-HENNEPIN INDEP. SCH. DIST. #11, SELF-INSURED/PREFERRED WORKS, INC., Employer,
and
MN DEP'T OF ECONOMIC SEC. and LEE MEMORIAL HOSP., Intervenors.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
May 6, 1999
         HEADNOTES          PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - DISMISSAL. The employee supplied sufficient medical information to support a claim for a specific work injury to the right shoulder on September 26, 1991, under Minn. Stat. § 176.291, subd. 5, and the compensation judge erred in dismissing the employee's claim petition. Although this court cannot tell whether other medical evidence may support the employee's claim of a Gillette injury to the right shoulder on December 16, 1991, or his claim of a consequential depression, the compensation judge exceeded his authority in dismissing the employee's claim petition with prejudice. See Minn. Stat. § 176.305, subd. 4. The judge's order is, accordingly, reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.          Reversed and remanded.           Determined by Johnson, J., Pederson, J., and Wilson, J.           Compensation Judge: James R. Otto           OPINION           THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Judge          The employee appeals from the compensation judge's order dismissing his claim petition, with prejudice. We reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.          BACKGROUND          The employee, Michael A. Balma, was employed by Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District #11, the employer, on September 26, 1991. The employer was self-insured for workers' compensation liability with claims administered by Preferred Works, Inc. On August 11, 1997, the employee, through counsel, filed a claim petition alleging he sustained a right shoulder injury and psychological injury on September 26, 1991 arising out of his employment. The employee claimed entitlement to temporary total, temporary partial, and permanent total disability benefits together with medical expenses and rehabilitation benefits. Filed with the claim petition were medical records and reports from Dr. Abbott Kagan II, Dr. Mark E. Farmer and an MRI report dated June 27, 1997. (Judgment Roll.) In its answer to the claim petition, the employer denied the employee sustained a personal injury arising out of his employment, denied entitlement to workers' compensation benefits and alleged the employee's claim petition failed to provide adequate medical support for a psychological injury. The employer further stated that an independent medical examination was scheduled with Dr. Douglas Becker and the employer reserved its right to schedule a psychiatric/psychological examination of the employee.           On October 14, 1997, the employee's original counsel filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. By order filed November 25, 1997, the case was stricken from the trial calendar pending completion of all necessary discovery. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT