Berube v. Twin Rivers Paper Co., LLC, 011521 MEWC, 20-4

Case DateJanuary 15, 2021
CourtMaine
LAWRENCE BERUBE (Appellee)
v.
TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY, LLC (Appellant)
and
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. (Appellant)
Decision No. 20-4
App. Div. No. 18-0053
Maine Workers Compensation Decisions
State of Maine Workers’ Compensation Board
January 15, 2021
          Argued: June 12, 2019.           Attorneys for Appellant: Anne-Marie Storey, Esq., John Hamer, Esq., RUDMAN WINCHELL.           Attorney for Appellee: Jon S. Oxman, Esq., LINNELL, CHOATE & WEBBER.           PANEL MEMBERS: Administrative Law Judges Elwin, Collier, and Stovall.           Elwin, Administrative Law Judge.          [¶1] Twin Rivers appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board administrative law judge (Hirtle, ALJ) denying its Petition for Review of Decision of the Supplemental Benefits Fund, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 355-C(3) (Pamph. 2020). We affirm the decision.          I. BACKGROUND          [¶2] Lawrence Berube injured his back on September 15, 1993, while working for Fraser Paper Company, predecessor to Twin Rivers Paper Company. After Mr. Berube’s employment was terminated in 1996, Fraser paid him total incapacity benefits.          [¶3] The board approved a consent decree on December 7, 1998, finding that Mr. Berube had experienced 14% permanent impairment due to the 1993 work injury, and 10% permanent impairment due to an earlier work-related low back injury. The consent decree ordered that “… reimbursement to [Fraser] for the payment of all benefits payable in excess of 260 weeks of compensation under 39-A M.R.S.A. §213(3), must be paid from the Employment Rehabilitation Fund….” This payment source, known as the Supplemental Benefits Fund (SBF), see 39-A M.R.S.A. § 355-A (Pamph. 2020), was not a party to the consent decree and was not given prior notice of the petition that resulted in the finding of 14% whole person permanent impairment.          [¶4] The board issued a decision on September 15, 2006, granting Fraser’s petition for review, finding that Mr. Berube had retained partial work capacity and reducing his benefits based on an imputed earning capacity of $320.00 per week.          [¶5] By letter dated November 13, 2006, Fraser’s claims management administrator, Sedgwick CMS, asked SBF for reimbursement of benefits paid to Mr. Berube, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 213(3) (Supp. 2020). SBF...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT