Brown v. KNC Management Enterprises, Inc., 112519 RIWC, 2013-00798

Case DateNovember 25, 2019
CourtRhode Island
PATRICIA A. BROWN
v.
KNC MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
W.C.C. No. 2013-00798
Rhode Island Worker Compensation
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Providence
November 25, 2019
         FINAL DECREE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION          This matter came on to be heard before the Appellate Division upon the claim of appeal of the petitioner/employee and upon consideration thereof, the employee's appeal is denied and dismissed, and it is          ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:          That the findings and orders contained in a decree of this Court entered on July 15, 2014 be, arid they hereby are, affirmed.          PER ORDER:          Nicholas DiFilippo, Administrator           DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION           OLSSON, J.          This matter is before the Appellate Division on the employee's claim of appeal from a decision and decree of the trial judge denying the employee's original petition for compensation benefits. The employee alleged that she sustained work-related injuries to her neck, back, left arm, left shoulder, and left hip on January 6,2013 when she slipped and fell in a parking lot while leaving work after the end of her shift. The issue before the trial judge was whether recovery for the employee was precluded by the exclusionary going-and-coming rule, or whether the specific circumstances of this matter met one of the rule's narrow exceptions so that the employee's injury would be compensable. After a comprehensive review of the record in this matter, the respective arguments of the parties, and the pertinent statutory and case law, we deny the employee's appeal.          Patricia Brown (the employee) testified that she had been employed as a server at International House of Pancakes (IHOP/ the employer), located at Pleasant Valley Parkway, Providence, since 2009.[1] A Burger King restaurant was located to the side of the IHOP building on the same parcel of land. The employee worked the third shift twice a week, arriving to work at midnight and leaving work between 4:00 and 6:00 in the morning. On January 6, 2013, after clocking out of her shift at 5:29 a.m., she left through the front door of the IHOP restaurant and walked with a co-employee to her car in the parking lot, which was adjacent to the IHOP building. She walked the length of the building and then less than twenty (20) feet to the right before she reached the location of her vehicle. As the employee passed the front of her car, she slipped and fell on snow and ice landing on her left forearm and then her left side. Following her fall, she went back into the IHOP building to fill out an incident report. After filling out the report, she returned home to ice her left shoulder. She went to Kent Hospital later that morning and was treated for her injuries.[2]          The employee described the IHOP restaurant as having a front door, two side doors, and a back door. She testified that a couple months prior to the incident, the employees were told by management that they could only use the front door to enter and exit the building. The employee stated that IHOP employees were permitted to park anywhere in the lot which surrounded the IHOP and the Burger King as there were no designated spaces or areas specifically for employees.          Rochelle Gallagher, the night manager at IHOP, explained that the employees could exit the building by using the front door or a side door, but that the management preferred that they use the front door. The employees could not use the door on the other side of the building or the back door because they were designated as emergency exits only and are alarmed. Ms. Gallagher testified that IHOP's employees were allowed to park anywhere in the parking lot that surrounded the IHOP building. She also stated that the parking lot is shared with the Burger King restaurant next door. It was her understanding that the parking lot was owned by a third company, Jan Co.          Greg Galino, the real estate manager at Jan Companies ("Jan Co."). testified under a subpoena issued by the employee. He explained that Jan Co. Central owned the buildings that contained both the IHOP and the Burger King restaurants. The Jan Co. Central entity also owned the entire parking lot that surrounded the restaurants. The business entity which operated the IHOP restaurant leased the building from Jan Co. Central. See Ee's Ex. 3. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement, all areas of the parcel, but for the buildings, were designated as common areas. See Ee's Ex. 3, Lease Agreement, Article 1, Section 1.04 at *2. Mr, Galino stated that Jan Co. Central had a contract with the Baxter Trucking Company for snow removal in the parking lot. Baxter Trucking Company would automatically remove the snow from the parking lot once the snow reached a certain amount. Jan Co. Central would pay Baxter Trucking Company directly for the snow removal and then Jan Co. Central would bill IHOP for their pro-rata share (45.2%) of the snow removal expenses as specified in the lease agreement. See Ee's Ex. 3, Lease Agreement, Article 2. The snow removal expenses, as well as other maintenance expenses and taxes, were charged to IHOP in addition to the annual lease amount owed to Jan Co. Central.          After reviewing the evidence, the trial judge concluded that the employee's injury was not compensable due to the going-and-coming rule which precludes recovery when an employee's injury occurs while traveling to or from the workplace. In arriving at this determination, the trial judge considered the fact that the employee had punched out after finishing her work shift, the fact that the employer did not own or maintain the parking lot, and the fact that the employer did not control the employee's route to her vehicle. He determined that the employee's claim did not meet any of the recognized exceptions to the rule that bars recovery. In making this analysis, the trial judge found the facts in this matter to be significantly different from the circumstances presented in cases where...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT