Champagne v. General Motors Corp., 051106 MIWC, 2006-39

Case DateMay 11, 2006
CourtMichigan
ROSEMARIE L. CHAMPAGNE, SS# xxx, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, SELF-INSURED, DEFENDANT.
No. 2006-39
Michigan Workers Compensation
State of Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth Workers’ Compensation Agency Board of Magistrates
May 11, 2006
         The social security number and dates of birth have been redacted from this opinion.           Steven Pollok (P#27592) for Plaintiff.           Mark Anderson (P#31564) for Defendant.           OPINION           CHRISTOPHER P. AMBROSE 215G, JUDGE          STATEMENT OF CLAIM:          Plaintiff filed an Application which was received by the Bureau on December 11, 2003. At that time, Plaintiff alleged a number of injury dates including the injury date of February 19, 2002. At the time of trial, Plaintiff’s counsel asserted that the date of injury being claimed in this matter is February 19, 2002. In fact, Defendant stipulated to an injury on that date. In briefs submitted by the parties, as well as argument presented on the record, the issues in this case are quite limited. The primary issue is whether or not Defendant is entitled to a credit under Section 354 for holiday pay, when Plaintiff was required to take it due to a plant shutdown. It is Plaintiff's position that Defendant is not entitled to receive a credit for vacation and holiday pay when Plaintiff is required to take that time off. Statutorily, this translates into the question of whether or not holiday pay taken during involuntary periods of time off is a “wage continuation” under Section 354 of the Workers’ Compensation Act. There also exists the issue of whether a February 20, 2003 voluntary payment agreement allows Plaintiff to claim benefits prior that date.          STIPULATIONS:          The parties stipulated that the Plaintiff has established a work related injury, with an injury date of February 19, 2002. The parties also stipulated that there is an average weekly wage of $1043.88, with a corresponding workers’ compensation rate of $571.25. The balance of stipulations are set forth in Joint Exhibit 1 presented by the parties at the time of the hearing in this matter.          WITNESSES TESTIFYING PERSONALLY:          Plaintiff:          Rosemarie Champagne, Plaintiff          EXHIBITS:          Plaintiff:          1. Plaintiff's trial brief.          Defendant:          A. Defendant’s trial brief.          Joint Exhibit:          1. Stipulated set of facts, along with various exhibits attached thereto.          DISCUSSION          Although briefs by both sides were submitted at the time of trial, along with a stipulated set of facts, Plaintiff did briefly testify on the hearing date.          Plaintiff testified regarding the voluntary payment agreement that was entered into between herself and Defendant...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT