Chapek v. Earth Energy, Inc., 041416 IDWC, IC 15000112

Case DateApril 14, 2016
CourtIdaho
GABRIEL CHAPEK, Petitioner,
v.
EARTH ENERGY, INC., Employer,
and
IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND, Surety, Defendants.
Nos. IC 15000112, 2010-016531
Idaho Workers Compensation
Before the Industrial Commission of the state of Idaho
April 14, 2016
          ORDER ON PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF           R.D. Maynard, Chairman.          On or about February 19, 2016, Gabriel Chapek, Petitioner herein, moved the Commission pursuant to JRP 15 for its order clarifying Petitioner's rights to the proceeds of a proposed lump sum settlement. Specifically, Petitioner seeks guidance from the Commission as to whether a prior decree of divorce between Petitioner and his ex-wife dividing "settlement funds" from a work related accident creates an interest in Petitioner's ex-wife to the proceeds of a proposed lump sum settlement. From the Petition, and supporting documents, it appears that Petitioner's ex-wife, now known as Nakel Archibald (hereinafter Nakel), was appropriately served with a copy of the Petition and supporting documents. Nakel has not appeared or otherwise responded to the Petition as allowed pursuant to JRP 15(e).          FACTS          At all times relevant hereto, Petitioner was an employee of Earth Energy, Inc., which insured its workers compensation risk with the State Insurance Fund. On or about June 11, 2010, Petitioner suffered a compensable accident/injury under the workers' compensation laws of this State. On that date, Petitioner was involved in a single motor vehicle accident which resulted in severe injuries to Petitioner. Petitioner's claim was accepted by employer/surety, and Petitioner received indemnity and medical benefits. Petitioner was not pronounced medically stable from his injuries until on or about October 14, 2014. In the interim, Nakel filed for and was granted a divorce pursuant to stipulation for entry of judgment and decree of divorce approved by Judge Comstock on or about February 24, 2012. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Judge Comstock ordered, inter alia:
Each party is awarded 50% of all settlement funds received by Defendant for the accident in which Defendant suffered in July of 2010. Paragraph 12 Defendant's Settlement Funds
         As of the date of medical stability it was determined that Petitioner was entitled to a 60% whole person impairment rating for the effects of the subject accident.          On or about December 9, 2015, Petitioner and employer/surety reached a tentative settlement of the underlying workers' compensation claim, pursuant to the terms of which Petitioner would receive the sum of $250,000, new money. This sum included unpaid and uncontested impairment still owed as of the date of mediation. The proposed lump sum settlement has not yet been approved by the Industrial Commission pending a determination of whether, pursuant to paragraph 12 of the judgment and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT