Churchich v. International Nutrition, Inc., 012017 NEWC, 0019

Case DateJanuary 20, 2017
CourtNebraska
JOSEPH CHURCHICH, Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL NUTRITION, INC. and AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA INC., and WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.
No. 0019
Doc. 215
Nebraska Workers Compensation
January 20, 2017
          Plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Govaerts, Vincent M. Powers & Associates.           Defendants: Gregory D. Worth, McAnany Van Cleave & Phillips           AWARD           Daniel R. Fridrich, Judge          This cause came on for hearing before the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court in Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, on 16th day of December, 2016, on the petition of the plaintiff, answer of the defendants and on the evidence, Judge Daniel R. Fridrich, one of the judges of said court, presiding. Plaintiff appeared in person and was represented by counsel. Defendants were represented by counsel.          Plaintiff offered Exhibits 1 through 16. Defendants objected to Exhibits 10, 11, 12, and 13 on the grounds of foundation, hearsay and relevance. The Court sustained the hearsay and relevance objections to Exhibit 10, but overruled all objections to Exhibits 11, 12 and 13. Exhibits 1 through 9 and 11 through 16 were received into evidence. Plaintiff made an offer of proof of Exhibit 10. Exhibit 10 was retained by the Court as an offer of proof only. Defendants offered Exhibits 17 through 19, which were received into evidence without objection.          As stated, plaintiff offered Exhibit 4, which is the transcript of the deposition of Dr. Chris Cornett. There are two exhibits attached to the deposition. Those exhibits are marked as Exhibit numbers 1 and 2. Those two exhibits are not the same as Exhibits 1 and 2 offered by plaintiff, meaning there are two sets of exhibits marked as Exhibits 1 and 2. If the Court is referring to Exhibits 1 and 2 attached to the deposition, the Court will reference those as Deposition Exhibit 1 or Deposition Exhibit 2. The Court deems both Deposition Exhibit 1 and Deposition Exhibit 2 to have been offered and received into evidence.          The parties stipulated to the following facts, which the Court accepts as true but for one (see #5 below) :          1. On January 20, 2014, the plaintiff, while employed by International Nutrition, Inc. (hereinafter "International"), suffered an accident and injury arising out of and in the course of his employment;          2. Plaintiff gave notice of his accident and injury to the defendants as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-133; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT