Corretjer v. Principal Life Insurance Co., 012016 NEWC, 0032

Case DateJanuary 20, 2016
CourtNebraska
ENRIQUE J. CORRETJER, Plaintiff,
v.
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant.
No. 0032
Doc. 215
Nebraska Workers Compensation
January 20, 2016
          ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS           John R. Hoffert, Judge          This matter is before the Court upon defendant's Motion for Sanctions. Counsel for the parties appeared by telephone.          The present motion was scheduled to be heard along with two other motions. The defendant filed a Motion [To] Compel Medical Examination. The plaintiff, in turn, has filed a Motion to Continue defendant's aforementioned Motion to Compel. In light of the Court's conclusions and ruling on the defendant's Motion for Sanctions, the two motions referenced above are moot and need not be addressed.          In support of its Motion for Sanctions, the defendant has offered Exhibits 10 through 18. The plaintiff voiced no objections to the receipt of the tendered materials. Consequently, defendant's Exhibits 10 through 18 were received into evidence.          The plaintiff, in turn, offered Exhibits 1 and 7 through 9 into evidence. The defendant, likewise, offered no objections. Therefore, plaintiff's Exhibits 1 and 7 through 9 were received as well.          Argument was presented. The Court having had the benefit of same; having reviewed the exhibits received into evidence; and, being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows.          By way of background and for the benefit of the reader as well as any appellate reviewing body, the present action was commenced by the plaintiff on January 9, 2015, or one year prior to the present hearing. The date of plaintiff's alleged accident is claimed as February 25, 2014. The alleged injury is described as "epileptic seizures as a result of external stimuli occurring while in the course of his employment with the defendant." (P 2 of plaintiff's 1 st Amended Petition).          The defendant has attempted without success to have the plaintiff examined by a medical expert(s) of its choosing as allowed by applicable statutory and rules of discovery. After the plaintiff failed...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT