Cousins v. Hughes Brothers, Inc., 090607 NEWC, 1078

Case DateSeptember 06, 2007
CourtNebraska
TRACY COUSINS, Plaintiff,
v.
HUGHES BROTHERS, INC., Defendant.
No. 1078
DOC 204
Nebraska Workers Compensation
September 6, 2007
          Timothy S. Dowd , Attorney at Law           Julie A. Martin, Attorney at Law           ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE ON REVIEW          BACKGROUND          Beginning in 1996 the plaintiff was employed by the defendant. During the course and scope of her employment, the plaintiff was exposed to various chemicals. In February 2004 the plaintiff’s chest began getting tighter and tighter (E1, p. 1). The defendant accommodated the plaintiff and the plaintiff remained at work until August 4, 2004, when she stopped work.          The plaintiff has been treated by numerous physicians. Dr. Barbara Froehner states the plaintiff has reactive lung disease due to or at least aggravated by her work situation and chemicals that she was exposed to at work (E13).          Dr. John Rudersdorf states that plaintiff’s occupational lung disease was exacerbated by plaintiff’s occupational exposure while employed by the defendant (E16, p. 2).          Dr. Suzanne Von Essen testifies that "it is more probable than not that work exposures caused the airway hyper-responsiveness demonstrated by the positive methacholine challenge test." (E22, p. 1). This airway hyper-responsiveness is consistent with an asthmatic reaction.          Michelle Hultine was appointed vocational rehabilitation counselor to prepare a loss of earning power report and make recommendations on vocational rehabilitation services. Ms. Hultine was given a medical report from Dr. John Rudersdorf dated August 16, 2004, which states that "Tracy would spend 5-10% of the year having episodes of exacerbations of various asthma and bronchietic episodes with some slight exposures to these allergens throughout her work environment, whatever job she would perform." (E16, p. 1). The plaintiff is to avoid concentrated exposures to extreme cold, extreme hot, and perfumes. She needs to avoid moderate exposure to fumes, odors, dust, gases, cigarette smoke, smoldering fluxes, solvents/cleaners, and chemicals. Ms. Hultine also had a report from Dr. Barbara Froehner which states that the plaintiff will no longer be able to work where she has exposure to not only these chemicals, but also the other chemical irritants. Ms. Hultine prepared...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT