CP# 2002-40978 (2007). RODERICK POPE, Petitioner vs. SALVATION ARMY, Respondent.
Court | New Jersey |
New Jersey Worker's Compensation
2007.
CP# 2002-40978 (2007).
RODERICK POPE, Petitioner vs. SALVATION ARMY, Respondent
NEW JERSEY
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
ELIZABETH, UNION COUNTY DISTRICT.RODERICK POPE, Petitioner, vs. SALVATION
ARMY, Respondent.CLAIM PETITION
NO.: 2002-40978DECISION:OCTOBER 18,
2007BEFORE:THE HONORABLE
PETER F. WOMACK,JUDGE OF
COMPENSATION.APPEARANCES: THOMAS E. HOOD, ESQS., BY:
GERALD DELLA SALLA, ESQ., NO APPEARANCE Attorneys for
the PetitionerCAPEHART
and SCATCHARD, ESQS, BY: MELISSA BIABLOS, ESQ., NO
APPEARANCE. Attorneys for the Respondent.THERESA M. GIAIMO,
CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER WILLIAM C. O'BRIEN
ASSOCIATES 525 BOULEVARD, P.O. BOX 428 KENILWORTH, NEW
JERSEY 07033 (908) 276-8664The COURT: In the matter of Roderick Pope versus Salvation Army,
Claim Petition 2002-40978, the petitioner was injured on March 29, 2002 while
pulling a clothes cart for the Salvation Army. The issue is whether Petitioner
is in an employment relationship with the Salvation Army.
Petitioner was incarcerated in the Union County Jail Complex for
six months, for violating his parole. Four months into his sentence he became
aware of a drug program offered by the Salvation Army. Petitioner was aware
that if he was accepted in the program he would be in the program for six
months. He would receive housing, meals, clothes and $18 a week. He would be
receiving counselling on drug problems. This was an interfaith based program so
he would be going to religious classes on a regular base. He would work five
days a week as well. If he broke any rules in the drug program he would be back
in jail for the rest of his sentence. When asked why he signed up for the
program, Petitioner replied that he had a drug problem and felt he needed help
in handling this problem. Petitioner stated that he could have easily spent the
last two months doing his jail time, but he wanted drug rehabilitation.
Petitioner also indicated he had been in a different type of drug
rehabilitation in the past, so that he had some idea what a drug rehabilitation
program was like. He specifically indicated that he did not think he was
applying for a job, but he was applying to get into a drug rehabilitation
program.
Mr. Philip Dougherty did appear for the respondent as a witness
and stated that he used to work for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial