CP# 2009-19873 and 2009-15821 (2010). Petro Tsybulskyy, Petitioner vs. Tsybulskyy Construction LLC ASAP Carpentry, Respondents.
Court | New Jersey |
New Jersey Worker's Compensation
2010.
CP# 2009-19873 and 2009-15821 (2010).
Petro Tsybulskyy, Petitioner vs. Tsybulskyy Construction LLC ASAP Carpentry, Respondents
CP# 2009-19873
Tsybulskyy vs. Tsybulskyy's Construction LLC and CP# 2000-915821 Tsybulskyy vs.
ASAP Carpentry STATE OF NEW
JERSEY NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATIONC.P. #'s 2009-19873 and 2009-15821 Petro Tsybulskyy, Petitioner
vs.Tsybulskyy Construction LLC ASAP
Carpentry,RespondentsDECISIONBEFORE: Honorable
Virginia M. Dietrich,A.S.J.W.C This is my decision in the matter of Tsybulskyy vs. Tsybulskyy's
Construction LLC , claim petition number 2009 - 19873 and in the matter of
Tsybulskyy vs. ASAP Carpentry, claim petition number 2009 - 15821. The
petitioner, Petro Tsybulskyy alleges in these petitions that he was an employee
of Tsybulskyy Construction LLC and a subcontractor for ASAP carpentry. The
petitioner was at a worksite on May 28, 2009 when he fell from scaffolding. He
was severely injured sustaining injuries to his face, airway, both hands, both
wrists, ribs and right leg. The petitioner filed claim petitions against both
respondents referenced above. Shortly thereafter, the petitioner filed a motion
for medical and temporary disability benefits against both respondents. The
respondent carrier for Tsybulskyy Construction LLC, Americans Zurich insurance
company, denied the accident and put the petitioner to his proofs. The
answer to the motion from the carrier for Tsybulskyy Construction LLC alleged
that the petitioner had declined personal (proprietor's) coverage when he had
applied for workers compensation insurance.
The carrier for ASAP carpentry, Continental Indemnity Company
alleged in its answer that the petitioner had not been in its employ on the
date alleged in the petition and that the accident had not arisen out of and in
the course of employment for ASAP carpentry. In its answer to the motion for
temporary and medical benefits, Continental Indemnity Company alleged again
that petitioner was not in its employ and that petitioner was an independent
contractor.
The two issues before the court are first did the petitioner
elect proprietor's coverage at the inception of the policy with American Zurich
Insurance company and therefore be entitled to coverage and benefits and
secondly if there is to be no coverage afforded by American Zurich for the
petitioner, is the petitioner eligible to be covered as an employee of an
uninsured subcontractor by the general contractor on the worksite and therefore
entitled to medical and temporary benefits.
The parties agreed to try the issue of coverage before addressing
the petitioner's need for treatment or temporary disability benefits. The
petitioner testified through a Russian interpreter. The petitioner testified
that he was owner of Tsybulskyy Construction LLC and that he had been in
business in New Jersey for several years. He testified that his son Viktor
assisted him with the incorporation documents. He also testified that he was
not involved in any conversations or meetings with any insurance brokers or
insurance companies. It was his testimony that when the bills came he would pay
them. His son Viktor was not an employee of Tsybulskyy construction. He
did not receive any financial remuneration for his assistance with the
paperwork. Mr. Tsybulskyy had another son Yuri who was an employee of the
company. Yuri Tsybulskyy was at the worksite on the day that Mr. Petro
Tsybulskyy was injured.
Petra Tsybulskyy and Yuri Tsybulskyy worked as siders at various
residential construction sites. In Mr. Tsybulskyy estimation, he had worked on
four or five houses for ASAP Carpentry Inc. It was his testimony that
when needed, ASAP Carpentry would call Mr. Tsybulskyy and request that he go to
particular job site. It was his testimony that because his English was
nonexistent, the information from ASAP was given to his son Yuri. There was no
contract or any written understanding between Tsybulskyy Construction Company
and ASAP Carpentry. The accident happened at a worksite in Metuchen, New
Jersey. Before commencing work, someone at ASAP carpentry asked Mr. Tsybulskyy
for proof of insurance. He obtained a certificate of insurance and provided it
to ASAP Carpentry. Mr. Tsybulskyy testified that without
furnishing proof of insurance he would not get the job.
Mr. Tsybulskyy testified that he was not familiar with and did
not know the broker Joseph Schipsi. It was his testimony that he had
never spoken with Mr. Schipsi. The only person who negotiated insurance in
behalf of Mr. Petro Tsybulskyy was his son Viktor Tsybulskyy.
On cross-examination, Mr. Tsybulskyy again reiterated that he
spoke no English other than thank you, goodbye or hello. He testified
that he was trained in doing siding, windows and doors. He also admitted that
he did work for other companies other than ASAP carpentry...
To continue reading
Request your trial