CP# 97-036306 (2001). James E. Navarro, Petitioner vs. Traycon Manufacturing Co., Inc. Respondent.
Court | New Jersey |
New Jersey Worker's Compensation
2001.
CP# 97-036306 (2001).
James E. Navarro, Petitioner vs. Traycon Manufacturing Co., Inc. Respondent
CP# 97-36306 Navarro v. Traycon Manufacturing Co.,
Inc.State of New Jersey
Department of Labor Division of Workers' Compensation
Lebanon DistrictClaim Petition
97-036306 James E. Navarro, Petitioner vs.
Traycon Manufacturing Co., Inc. RespondentDECISIONBefore:Honorable
Elaine B. Goldsmith, Judge of
Compensation Appearances:
Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola, Lundell and Levett,
Esquires By: Robert Golden, Esquire, Attorney for Petitioner
Howard W. Crusey, Jr.,
Esquire By: Marcia Miller, Esquire, Attorney for
RespondentThis matter comes before me as a bifurcated Second Injury Fund
trial to determine whether the etiology of the interstitial pulmonary fibrosis
from which Petitioner suffers is causally related to his occupational exposure.
Both parties stipulate that the petitioner is permanently and totally disabled
as a result of the pulmonary disease.
The evidence in this matter consisted of the lay testimony of the
petitioner and medical expert testimony. Dr. Roland Goodman, Board Certified in
Internal Medicine and Dr. Susan M. Daum, Board Certified in Internal Medicine,
Preventative Medicine (Occupational Medicine) and Fellow of the American
College of Chest Physicians, testified for the petitioner. Dr. Joel Duberstein,
Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Pulmonary Disease, testified for the
Respondent. The documents consisted of three admission records to Holy Name
Hospital dated September 9, 1996, December 8, 1996, and October 31, 2000;
treating records and the November 17, 1997 letter report of Dr. Selwyn Levine;
admission records to Somerset Medical Center dated January 20, 1999 and
February 17, 1999; the hypothetical question; two reports from Dr. Warren M.
Klein, opthomologist; and excerpts and articles from various professional
journals and medical books.
From 1973 to 1978 petitioner was employed by Ford Motor Company
and Packaging Sales and Development of Englewood New Jersey, both places
described as having clean environments. From 1978 to September 9, 1996
petitioner worked for the respondent as a sheet metal mechanic welder.
Specifically, he installed food service conveyers and constructed parts needed
for the custom installations. Part of the time was spent in the factory
building with 18 other employees where everyone was engaged in "grinding,
polishing and welding" at the same time. The ventilation was poor and the
facility was "very dirty," being characterized as having a gritty smoky
atmosphere. The remainder of his time was spent in the field installing
conveyers in hospitals, banks and other buildings.
Most of the on site installations were done during the night or
week-ends when none of the employees were around and the ventilators or air
conditioners were turned off. Petitioner claimed that the work in the field was
dirtier than in the factory because he was dealing with old metal and dirty
food encrusted conditions, where he would have to cut and grind in a closed
atmosphere. He tried to wear a paper mask as much as possible but found it
inadequate for filtering out the dust. Petitioner primarily used the Healy arc
welder with argon gas and occasionally used oxyacetylene torches.
Petitioner also installed dumbwaiters which are multi storied
small shaft vertical elevators used for conveying food to patients in
hospitals. In these very small confined areas he would climb on the individual
shelves cutting old metal chains, grinding and installing new metal pieces.
Repairing these small units often required removal of the sound deadeners which
were made of a heavy tar-like material. When the material was cut, ground or
welded, "it did nothing but smoke." Petitioner estimated that he worked on
forty of these special jobs, each one lasting a week or two to complete.
On one occasion he was assigned to move a large volume of old
scrap metal from the factory yard to metal racks against the factory wall. The
metal pieces had been accumulating for many years and were so full of pollen,
dust and dirt that he was forced to change the mask he was wearing ten to
fifteen times a day because it got so black. On September 9, 1996, he became
very short of breath and was hospitalized at Holy Name Hospital for asthmatic
bronchitis, and was treated with corticosteroids. Five days after he was taken
off the corticosteroids he returned to the hospital where a chest x-ray was
taken. The chest x-ray showed "ground glass" interstitial infiltrates. Further
lung tests showed moderate restrictive lung disease and severe reduction of
diffusion capacity.
From November 11th to the -15th, 1996 Petitioner was hospitalized
in Chilton Memorial Hospital where he was treated with increased doses of
intravenous steroids. He was released with a discharge diagnosis of respiratory
insufficiency, pulmonary fibrosis, and cardiac arrhythmia. There is mention in
the discharge summary of the possibility of Petitioner requiring a lung
transplant.
On December 6, 1996 at Holy Name Hospital, Dr. Levine,
petitioner's treating doctor performed an open lung biopsy. Dr. Levine
summarized the biopsy as revealing advanced interstitial lung disease with
pulmonary fibrosis. This biopsy was also interpreted by the Mayo Clinic.
On December 8, 1996 after the thoracoscopic lung biopsy the
Petitioner developed a recurrent pneumothorax on the right side of his chest
for which a tube was inserted and suction commenced, requiring him to stay in
the hospital until December 12. He now required the occasional use of oxygen at
home...
To continue reading
Request your trial