Craver v. General Motors Corp., 032501 MIWC, 2011-196

Case DateMarch 25, 2001
CourtMichigan
Robert Craver, SS# XXX-XX- XXX Plaintiff,
v.
General Motors Corporation, Self-Insured, Defendant,
No. 2011-196
Michigan Workers Compensation
State Of Michigan Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth Workers’ Compensation Agency Board Of Magistrates
March 25, 2001
         The social security number and dates of birth have been redacted from this opinion.           There was no trial. The case was submitted on briefs which were due on February 22, 2011 and March 23, 2011.           Matthew A. Tyler (P34706), attorney for the Plaintiff           Benjamin Ligget (P66362), attorney for the Defendant           OPINION           PAUL PURCELL, MAGISTRATE          The parties agree that Plaintiff’s workers’ compensation rate is $580.00 per week based upon a 1999 date of injury (Defendant does not stipulate to injury or disability) with an average weekly wage of $1,157.00 per week and tax filing status of married filing jointly with zero dependents.          The parties agree that effective June 13, 2009 Plaintiff started receiving a monthly pension from the employer of $1,980.64. They agree it translates into a weekly pension amount of $457.42. After Plaintiff began receiving his pension the employer began to coordinate the pension with his weekly indemnity benefit. The parties agree that the employer may coordinate the pension under the provisions of the Act. The sole issue for trial is the amount to be coordinated.          The Defendant asserts that the Workers’ Compensation Agency has produced a computer program named Workers’ Comp Calc – Version 12.0 and that it is permitted to use such program in determining the amount to be coordinated. It claims that in using such program it is entitled to insert into the required information the fact that the payments made to the Plaintiff under the pension plan are not subject to FICA (Federal Insurance Contribution Act). In doing so it arrives at “an amount to be coordinated” of $396.44. Subtracting that amount from Plaintiff’s weekly rate it asserts that it should be paying him the sum of $183.56 per week ($457.42 – 396.44 = 183.56).          The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT