Crouch, 010516 INAGO, AGO 2016-2

Case DateJanuary 05, 2016
CourtIndiana
The Honorable Suzanne Crouch
AGO 2016-2
Official Opinion No. 2016-2
Indiana Attorney General Opinions
State of Indiana Office of the Attorney General
January 5, 2016
         The Honorable Suzanne Crouch          Auditor of State          200 W. Washington St.          Indianapolis, IN 46204          RE: Electronic Payment Policy and Electronic Funds Transfer          Dear Auditor Crouch:          You requested the opinion of the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) regarding the authority of the Auditor of the State to institute an electronic payment policy that would require political subdivisions and others to utilize an electronic funds transfer for certain remittances. Your specific questions are delineated below.          QUESTIONS PRESENTED          1. Can the Auditor of State (AOS) require political subdivisions to remit State funds using an electronic funds transfer (EFT)?          2. If the AOS can mandate the use of EFTs, how can the AOS enforce compliance with such a mandate?          BRIEF ANSWERS          1. Yes, the AOS can require political subdivisions to remit State funds using an EFT so long as in doing so it complies with the conditions provided in Ind. Code § 4-7-1-4.1.          2. The AOS can enforce the use of EFTs by rejecting payments made through other means; a political subdivision that does not make an acceptable payment by the time such payment is due is subject to statutory enforcement mechanisms.          ANALYSIS          1. The AOS has conditional authority to require political subdivisions to use EFTs when remitting State funds.          The AOS has the power and duty to "[d]irect and superintend the collection of all money due to the state." Ind. Code § 4-7-1-2(7). The AOS also has the power and duty to "[s]uperintend the fiscal concerns of the state and their management in the manner required by law and furnish the proper forms to [various officials of political subdivisions]." Ind. Code § 4-7-1-2(10). Ind. Code § 4-7-1-4.1(b) directly addresses the use of forms: "The auditor of state shall approve forms and reports used by the auditor of state in a paper form, as a facsimile, or in an electronic form …." Ind. Code § 4-7-1-4.1(c) empowers the AOS to facilitate this function: "The auditor of state may require that a form or report submitted to the auditor of state for processing must be submitted in paper form, as a facsimile, or electronically …."          Though none of these sections explicitly directs the AOS to compel the use of EFTs, such a power is implicit in the AOS's power to direct the use of particular forms. As a practical matter, before banks will make an EFT out of one account and into another, they require an authorization form giving them the authority to do so. Such a form must be properly authorized by...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT