Dedlow, 072619 WIWC, 2016-010756

Case DateJuly 26, 2019
CourtWisconsin
Walter Dedlow (Dec'd) Applicant
Kohler Co. Employer
Kohler Co., c/o Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. Insurer
Claim No. 2016-010756
Wisconsin Workers Compensation
State of Wisconsin Labor And Industry Review Commission
July 26, 2019
          Atty. Mark D. Gustafson           Atty. Peter Rank           Atty. James W. Goonan           WORKER’S COMPENSATION DECISION AND REMAND ORDER 1           Michael H. Gillick, Chairperson          Order          The commission affirms in part and reverses in part the decision of the administrative law judge. Accordingly, the applicant is entitled to an award of death benefits and burial expenses; the commission remands this matter for a decision as to the amount of benefits payable and any appropriate allocation.          By the Commission:           David B. Falstad, Commissioner, Georgia E. Maxwell, Commissioner.          Procedural Posture          In April of 2016, the applicant’s son (the applicant) filed a hearing application seeking compensation for an injury and death, with a last date of injury of January 1, 2001. An administrative law judge for the Department of Administration, Division of Hearings and Appeals, Office of Worker’s Compensation Hearings heard the matter on August 13, 2018, and issued a decision dated September 7, 2018, finding a work injury of silicosis, but finding that it was not a cause of the applicant’s death, and denying death benefits. The applicant filed a timely petition for review.          Prior to the hearing, the respondent conceded jurisdictional facts and the maximum wage for a date of injury of November 22, 2000, the last date the applicant actually worked. At issue is whether there is a compensable work injury, causation of death, medical expenses, burial expenses, and dependency.          The commission has considered the petition and the positions of the parties, and has independently reviewed the evidence. Based on its review, the commission affirms the decision in part and reverses the decision in part, and makes the following:          Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law          1. The applicant, who was born in 1935, worked for 46 years as a mold maker in the respondent’s foundry. He was exposed to sand and did not use a respirator.2 He retired in 2000 and died in 2015. The applicant also smoked approximately ¼ pack of cigarettes per day for 45 years, quitting in 2006.3          2. The applicant’s work and medical records show that he developed lung disease over time. The respondent’s records show radiologic checks dating back to 1955. In 1987, the applicant was first noted to have bullous emphysema at a radiologic check done by the respondent.4 On May 4, 1996, x-rays showed “Rather extensive lung disease most likely relating to chronic interstitial fibrosis or other interstitial lung disease along with COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] and bullous changes in both apices.”5 A chest CT on December 5, 1997, noted severe emphysema with extensive interstitial fibrosis and scarring.6 The respondent’s radiologic record in October of 1997 showed the applicant had COPD and interstitial fibrosis.[7]          3. After the applicant retired in 2000, a diagnostic x-ray on June 23, 2006, noted COPD with extensive chronic interstitial lung disease and peripheral pulmonary fibrosis.8 The applicant was hospitalized in 2010 for COPD and pneumonia.          4. In 2014, the applicant developed pneumonia and his health declined until his death in January of 2015. On July 25, 2014, the applicant was assessed with COPD with severe expiratory airflow obstruction, silicosis with fibrosis, resting hypoxemia corrected with supplemental oxygen, and bilateral pneumonia.[9] On September 24, 2014, the impression noted COPD/emphysema, interstitial lung disease/fibrosis, and pneumonia.10 Dr. Vidhyalakshmy Vivek, M.D., noted the applicant’s primary discharge diagnosis on October 5, 2014, included pulmonary fibrosis “most likely from silicosis.”[11] On October 28, 2014, a medical note indicates the applicant had an atypical mycobacterial infection of the lungs. His severe diffuse emphysema had progressed, and there were areas of necrosis in the left upper lung.12 The applicant died on January 8, 2015; the death certificate listed the immediate cause of death as COPD, due to or as a consequence of silicosis; pulmonary fibrosis.[13] No autopsy was performed.          5. The applicant submitted a WKC-16-B dated June 28, 2018, from Dr. Kenneth D. Rosenman, M.D., FACE, FACOEM, FACPM.14 Dr. Rosenman opined that the applicant’s 45-year exposure to silica, 1955-2000, caused and was at least a material contributory causative factor in the onset or progression of the applicant’s advanced lung disease, silicosis, causing death. Dr. Rosenman attached two letters to this WKC-16-B. In his first opinion letter, dated March 25, 2016, Dr. Rosenman noted that he reviewed the applicant’s medical records, his position history report, and his death certificate. Dr. Rosenman opined within a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the applicant had advanced silicosis that caused his death, and that his exposure to silica occurred during his 45 years of work for the respondent. He noted that the applicant did not have abnormalities on his breathing tests for the first 36 years or on his chest radiograph for the first 29 years of his work; and that this latency was within the range of usual onset of silicosis after initial exposure. Dr. Rosenman specifically opined that “The fact that he smoked cigarettes in no way negates the significance of silica exposure on causing his death.”15 In support of this position, Dr. Rosenman noted that there was a large literature on obstructive lung disease in individuals with silica exposure and whether or not the person smokes cigarettes, and he specifically referenced six articles.          6. Dr. Rosenman also attached a letter dated March 20, 2017, to Exhibit A in which he responded to the respondent’s doctor’s (Dr. Habel) opinion. Dr. Rosenman disagreed with Dr. Habel that the applicant did not have silicosis, and stated emphatically that the applicant “definitely had silicosis.”[16] He noted that his opinion was consistent with multiple clinicians who had treated the applicant. In addition to silicosis, Dr. Rosenman stated that the applicant also had COPD, which is a multifactorial disease and only 10-15% of cigarette smokers develop clinically significant COPD; he again referred to the medical literature that silica exposure contributes to the development of COPD and the articles he referenced previously. To attribute all of the applicant’s lung disease to cigarettes, Dr. Rosenman notes that Dr. Habel ignores the applicant’s 45-year exposure to silica. The applicant had advanced silicosis, which made him at risk for pneumonia. He again opined that the applicant’s work exposure was within a reasonable degree of medical certainty a significant contributor to the applicant’s underlying cause of death of silicosis and pulmonary fibrosis.          7. By letter dated July 30, 2018, Dr. Rosenman responded to the medical opinion of the respondent’s other doctor (Dr. Ford).17 In this letter...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT