Devos v. Rhino Contracting, Inc., 061219 MNWC, WC18-6240

Case DateJune 12, 2019
CourtMinnesota
JOHN DEVOS, Employee/Appellant,
v.
RHINO CONTRACTING, INC./SELF-INSURED, Employer/Respondent,
and
RTVERVIEW HEALTH, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD MINN./BLUE PLUS, and ALTRU HEALTH SYS., Intervenors, and SPECIAL COMP. FUND.
No. WC18-6240
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
June 12, 2019
         EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence supported the finding that the employee was hired in North Dakota by a North Dakota employer, for the purposes of applying Minn. Stat. § 176.041, subd. 5(b), which provides an exclusion from Minnesota jurisdiction where an employee so employed and hired was injured during temporary work in Minnesota.          STATUTES CONSTRUED - MINN. STAT. § 176.041, subd. 5(b). To determine whether work in Minnesota was “temporary” within the meaning of this provision, the extent of work performed for the employer in Minnesota during a single calendar year, from January 1 to December 31, must be reviewed. For an injury arising out of work performed on a specific date, the calendar year in which the date of injury falls is the calendar year that must be used pursuant to the statutory requirements.           Mark L. Rodgers, Kristen M. Rodgers, and James H. Perkett, Rodgers Law Office, P.L.L.C, Bemidji, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           Michael Garbow, Garbow Law Office, Bemidji, Minnesota, for the Respondent.           Determined by: Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge, Patricia J. Milun, Chief Judge, David A. Stofferahn, Judge.           Compensation Judge: Jerome G. Arnold          Affirmed.           OPINION           DEBORAH K. SUNDQUIST, Judge.          The employee appeals a Findings and Order on Remand in which the compensation judge found that he lacked extraterritorial jurisdiction pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 176.041, subd. 5(b) which grants North Dakota, not Minnesota, jurisdiction where the employee lives in Minnesota, is injured in Minnesota, yet was hired in North Dakota by a North Dakota employer, and the injury arose out of temporary work in Minnesota. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          John Devos, the employee, has lived in the Crookston, Minnesota, area for most of his life. On April 7, 2011, while in Grand Forks, North Dakota, the employee applied for and was offered a seasonal job as a laborer for Rhino Construction (Rhino), a North Dakota employer.1 Rhino provides underground utility construction and digging of lines for fiber optics, cable, telephone, gas, water, and sewer lines. During the winter months, when the ground is frozen, Rhino lays off all but about five permanent employees.          During the 2011 season, the employee worked for Rhino in both North Dakota and Minnesota, working more than 240 hours in Minnesota.2 In December 2011, at the end of a shift, Rhino co-owner, Andrew Lamoureux, asked the employee and his co-workers which of them wanted to “go home,” i.e., stop work for the season. The employee raised his hand and then left work. The employee testified that Mr. Lamoureux simply said, “all right, we’ll see you guys later.” (T. 22-23.) Thereafter, the employee applied for North Dakota unemployment benefits and indicated that his unemployment was temporary in nature. He hoped that Rhino would call him back to work for the 2012 season. From December 2011 to March 2012, the employee did not look for work.          In March 2012, at his home in Crookston, Minnesota, the employee took a call from Steve Abbey, also a co-owner of Rhino. The employee recalled that Abbey told the employee to “get back into the shop on Monday with your bags packed” and join a work crew about to leave for a job site. (T. 26.) The employee did not complete a new job application or undergo another interview. Unlike 2011, in 2012, the employee worked mostly in North Dakota and worked less than 240 hours in Minnesota.          On September 24, 2012, while at work for Rhino in East Grand Forks, Minnesota, the employee suffered a work-related injury to his femoral artery.3 The employee was transported to the hospital and underwent surgery. During recovery, the employee received workers’ compensation benefits through North Dakota’s Workforce Safety and Insurance (ND WSI).          The employee did not return to work with the employer. After April 17, 2014, ND WSI discontinued the employee’s...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT