Dillard v. Gm Spo-Flint, 062805 MIWC, 2006-147

Case DateJune 28, 2005
CourtMichigan
THERESA DILLARD SS #xxx Plaintiff,
v.
GM SPO-FLINT/ SELF-INSURED, Defendant.
No. 2006-147
Michigan Workers Compensation
State of Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth Workers’ Compensaiton Agency Board of Magistrates
June 28, 2005
         The social security number and dates of birth have been redacted from this opinion.           Trial was held on August 10,2 006 in Flint, Genesee County, Michigan.           THE PLAINTIFF Philip Vella Santina, P12652, for Plaintiff.           THE DEFENDANT Thomas J. Ruth, P44434, for defendant           OPINION           JENNIFER L. CRAWFORD, MAGISTRATE, 233G, JUDGE          THE CLAIM          Plaintiff alleges injuries to her bilateral hands and upper extremities and her low back as a result of employment activities up through and including her last day of work on October 23, 2000.          STIPULATIONS          1. That both the employer and the employee were subject to the Michigan compensation laws on the date of injury alleged, 10/23/00.          2. That the Defendant was self-insured and carried the risk.          3. That Plaintiff was in the employ of the Defendant on the date of the alleged injury.          4. That the employer had timely notice of the alleged personal injury within the statutory period.          5. That the appropriate workers’ compensation rate for the 2003 date of injury is $611.00 per week based upon a gross weekly wage of $1,399.26 and a filing status of married filing joint.          6. That dual employment is not applicable in this case.          7. That the employee did receive benefits in the form of Sickness & Accident (S&A) and Extended Disability Benefits (EDB), which are subject to coordination under Section 354 and 358 of the Act.          ISSUES          1. Whether claim was made within the statutory prescribed period by the employee.          2. Whether a personal injury arose out of and in the course of employment.          3. Whether any disability is due to the alleged personal injury.          4. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to medical expenses and treatment for the alleged injury.          WITNESSES TESTIFYING PERSONALLY Plaintiff:          Theresa Dillard, Plaintiff.          Defendant:          None          WITNESSES TESTIFYING BY DEPOSITION Plaintiff: ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT