Draper v. Vail Resorts, Inc., 112320 UTWC, 18-0732

Case DateNovember 23, 2020
CourtUtah
BLAKE DRAPER, Petitioner,
v.
VAIL RESORTS, INC., Respondent.
No. 18-0732
Utah Workers Compensation Decisions
Utah Labor Commission
November 23, 2020
         ORDER AFFIRMING ALJ’S DECISION           Kathleen Bounous, Chair          Vail Resorts, Inc. (“Vail”) asks the Appeals Board of the Utah Labor Commission to review Administrative Law Judge Newman’s award of benefits to Blake Draper under the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 34A, Chapter 2, Utah Code Annotated.          The Appeals Board exercises jurisdiction over this motion for review pursuant to §63G-4-301 of the Utah Administrative Procedures Act and §34A-2-801(4) of the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act.          BACKGROUND AND ISSUES PRESENTED          Mr. Draper claims workers’ compensation benefits for a head injury he sustained while working for Vail on January 22, 2018. Judge Rammell held an evidentiary hearing on Mr. Draper’s claim, which was then reassigned to Judge Newman. Judge Newman confirmed Judge Rammell’s findings of fact and referred the medical aspects of Mr. Draper’s claim to an impartial medical panel. The medical panel determined that the accident medically caused Mr. Draper to sustain a concussion and post-concussive symptoms worsened by his underlying psychological condition. The panel outlined the medical care necessary to treat Mr. Draper’s post-concussive condition and concluded that he had not reached medical stability.          Judge Newman relied on the medical panel’s conclusions over Vail’s objection and awarded benefits to Mr. Draper. Vail now seeks review of Judge Newman’s decision by arguing that it was error to rely on the medical panel’s conclusions. Specifically, Vail contends that the panel’s report requires clarification to differentiate between the past medical care Mr. Draper has received for his work-related injury and the care he received for his pre-existing psychological conditions.[1]          FINDINGS OF FACT          The Appeals Board adopts Judge Newman’s findings of fact and summarizes them as follows. On January 22, 2018, Mr. Draper was working for Vail as a lift lead, which involved ski lift maintenance. While he was working in a low-clearance area, Mr. Draper was struck in the head by a ski lift and knocked unconscious. Mr. Draper was taken to the emergency room where he underwent a CT scan and was assessed with a concussion, facial contusion, and facial laceration without significant deficit. Mr. Draper was released from the hospital, but he called WorkMed later that same night as he was not feeling well. At WorkMed, Mr...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT