Dziuk v. University of Minn., 031599 MNWC, 475-86-5986

Case DateMarch 15, 1999
CourtMinnesota
RICHARD DZIUK, Employee,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF MINN., SELF-INSURED, adm'd by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVS., Employer/Appellant.
No. 475-86-5986
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
March 15, 1999
         HEADNOTES          JOB OFFER - PHYSICAL SUITABILITY. Substantial evidence supports the compensation judge's determination that the transitional recycling job exceeded the employee's physical restrictions. The compensation judge's determination that the recycling job was not physically suitable renders irrelevant the question of the employee's good or bad faith in attempting the job.          REHABILITATION - COOPERATION; JOB SEARCH - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence supports the compensation judge's finding that the employee cooperated with rehabilitation assistance and conducted a reasonably diligent job search.          Affirmed.           Determined by Johnson, J., Wilson, J. and Wheeler, C.J.           Compensation Judge: Janice M. Culnane           OPINION           THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Judge          The self-insured employer appeals from the compensation judge's determination that the employee's transitional job in the employer's recycling center was not physically suitable, and that the employee made a good faith effort to perform the recycling job. The self-insured employer further appeals from the compensation judge's finding that the employee made a diligent search for employment and cooperated in good faith with rehabilitation efforts, and from her award of temporary total and temporary partial disability benefits. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          The employee, Richard Dziuk, had been employed as a building and grounds worker by the self-insured employer, the University of Minnesota, for ten years. On July 29, 1997, the employee was cleaning up after flooding on the 18th floor of Moos Tower. He sustained an admitted, work-related injury to his low back while emptying a barrel filled with wet acoustical ceiling tile into a dumpster. The employee was seen at Fairview Riverside Hospital the following morning complaining of stabbing pain in the right low back. He was given pain and anti-inflammatory medications and was taken off work.          The employee was then treated by Dr. Thomas Chester at HealthWorks. Dr. Chester diagnosed an acute lumbar sprain/strain, prescribed medications, and referred the employee to physical therapy. The employee continued to experience low back pain and stiffness, and in October 1997, Dr. Chester referred the employee to an orthopedist, Dr. David Boxall. The employee was first examined by Dr. Boxall on November 14, 1997. The employee reported persistent low back pain and intermittent pain radiating down the right leg. On examination, the doctor noted restricted range of motion and normal neurological findings. Dr. Boxall diagnosed a Grade I spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 and recommended a trial with a lumbar corset.          At about this same time, the self-insured employer assigned a qualified rehabilitation consultant (QRC), Patrick Wilder, who initially met with the employee on November 5, 1997. On November 17, 1997, QRC Wilder sent to Dr. Boxall a description of a job in the employer's recycling center. (See Exs. E, M; Ex. 1.) Dr. Boxall replied it was "ok to start," four hours a day, with no twisting, stooping, bending or climbing ladders. Apparently no light-duty work was available within Dr. Boxall's restrictions at that time. (See Ex. E: 12/10/97 chart note.) On December 1, 1997, the employee requested a change of QRC to Thomas Saby. (Judgment Roll.)          The employee returned to Dr. Boxall on December 10, 1997, reporting persistent low back pain radiating to the right buttock. On exam, the doctor noted muscle spasm and limited range of motion. Dr. Boxall prescribed a rigid brace and referred the employee to physical therapy for instruction in back stabilization and trunk strengthening. He released the employee to return to work with restrictions of no lifting over 20 pounds, avoid prolonged sitting or standing, and avoid repetitive bending or lifting.          On December 23, 1997, the employer sent a letter to the employee confirming a temporary assignment to the recycling center, starting December 29, 1997. (Ex. H.) On December 26, 1997, Dr. Boxall increased the employee's lifting restriction to 25 pounds, and indicated the employee could work full time. That same day, the employee filed a Rehabilitation Request seeking approval of the requested change to QRC Saby. The self-insured employer...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT