England v. General Motors Corp., 052119 MIWC, 7314

Case DateMay 21, 2019
CourtMichigan
Thomas J. England SSN: XXX-XX-XXXX Plaintiff,
v.
General Motors Corporation, Self-Insured Defendant,
No. 7314
Michigan Workers Compensation
State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules Workers’ Compensation Board of Magistrates
May 21, 2019
         The social security number and dates of birth have been redacted from this opinion.           TRIAL DATE: May 10, 2019           David J. Cooper (P12202) for Plaintiff           Thomas J. Ruth (P44434) for Defendant           OPINION           JOHN M. SIMS, MAGISTRATE (256G) JUDGE.          WITNESSES TESTIFYING PERSONALLY          Plaintiff:          Thomas J. England          Defendant:          None          WITNESSES TESTIFYING BY DEPOSITION          Plaintiff:          Michael L. Fox, D.O., taken on February 7, 2018          Defendant:          None          EXHIBITS          Joint:          1. Deposition of Michael L. Fox, D.O.          Plaintiff:          2. Medical records of Evelyn Eccles, M.D.          3. Letter authored by Attorney David Cooper to the claimant dated November 26, 2018 with an attached copy of the report of Dr. Michael L. Fox dated October 17, 2017.          4. Letter to Attorney David Cooper consisting of six handwritten pages authored by the claimant, Thomas England. The document is signed by Mr. England.          5. A one-page handwritten note by Thomas England addressed to Dr. Eccles.          6. A one-page document directed to the adjuster for the Defendant by Mr. England.          7. A set of billings and receipts identified as the complete billings incurred by Mr. England as a result of the nonpayment by Defendant.          All of the Plaintiff’s Exhibits were admitted and the Joint Exhibit was admitted without any objection.          Defendant          B. Then entire medical record of the treating physician Dr. Eccles along with original medical concerning the treatment of the claimant at the time of his original injury. These include the records of the treating physicians and examining physicians at the time of that original injury in 1992.          All Exhibits were admitted without objection.          EVIDENCE PRESENTED LAY TESTIMONY THOMAS ENGLAND, PLAINTIFF          Thomas J. England testified that he was born xx/xx/xx, making him 67 years of age as of the date of trial. He indicated that he was hired by General Motors Corporation in November of 1975 and his last day of work for this company was March 1, 1993. He further testified that he had a work-related injury at General Motors Corporation and that he redeemed liability for wage loss benefits as of June 7, 2016. That redemption left medical open with regards to his low back condition and a herniated disc at L5-S1.          Plaintiff testified that in February of 2017 a prescription that he received from his doctor; Dr. Evelyn Eccles, was denied. This prescription was for OxyContin, a drug that he had been taking for many years at the direction and prescription of his treating physician for low back pain associated with his alleged work-related injury. He further indicated that the Defendant and its administrator had paid prescription medicine bills regularly (Plaintiff testified that there had been other instances when the Defendant refused to pay a bill but eventually paid it).          Plaintiff indicated that he contacted the administrator for General Motors, to wit, Sedgwick, and requested that this prescription be paid and was advised that they would not pay it. He put the prescription on his Visa card and paid the prescription cost himself for approximately two months. He then applied to his Blue Cross Blue Shield coverage, pursuant to his retirement under his contract with the UAW and General Motors for payment of this prescription. Thereafter, and up to the point of time of trial, the health insurance carrier, Blue Cross Blue Shield, as part of his UAW retirement, has continued to pay for this medication, leaving him with a deductible to pay each month in the amount of roughly $111.30.          Plaintiff testified that on October 17, 2017 he met with Michael L. Fox, D.O., at the request of the Defendant for the purposes of an Independent Medical Examination. (Dr. Fox’s report is attached to various exhibits in this matter, as well as the deposition of the doctor, all of which were admitted into evidence at the time of trial.)          Plaintiff testified that Dr. Fox had suggested that he try getting off Oxycontin, abstain from alcohol and marijuana, and that he try other types of drugs. He testified he tried two different types of drugs, including Morphine Sulfate and those attempts were unsuccessful. He was also put on another drug which he said caused him to have headaches and did not improve his pain at all.          Plaintiff testified that Dr. Fox had recommended that he enter into detoxification. It was also suggested he begin using (Buprenorphine) as a substitute for the medications that he was receiving. He indicated that he was willing to try what the doctor suggested, but he had not been offered that opportunity.          Plaintiff strongly contested the characterization of Dr. Fox that he is an alcoholic. He testified that he does drink. He understands, based on something he claimed his father’s doctor told him, that it was good for him to have a couple of beers a day for his heart condition. He testified that at the present time he drinks at least two beers a day.          Plaintiff further testified that he uses marijuana and has for most of his life. (He testified he started drinking alcohol at age 17 and that he started smoking marijuana back in the 1970s.) Plaintiff indicated that he has never been in a detoxification center for alcohol. He has quit drinking on several occasions, the purpose of his quitting drinking was to save money, and he never experienced any delirium tremors or any other type of withdrawal when he stopped drinking alcohol.          Plaintiff denied that he ever threatened an adjuster with regards to the denial of his prescription medications. He requested reimbursement and he indicated that those requests were denied. He pointed out to the adjuster that he felt the adjuster did not understand how difficult it was for a person who was taking pain medications for a long time to be abruptly stopped in their treatment regimen. He was adamant that he never threatened anyone.          Plaintiff further testified that he paid for the Morphine Sulfate after it was rejected by the administrator, indicating that the administrator initially paid for the Morphine Sulfate when he attempted to take it, but then stopped paying for it. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT