Estate of Turnage v. Dole Refrigerating Co., Inc., 021220 TNWC, M2019-00422-SC-R3-WC

Case DateFebruary 12, 2020
CourtTennessee
ESTATE OF CLARENCE TURNAGE, ET AL.
v.
DOLE REFRIGERATING CO., INC.
No. M2019-00422-SC-R3-WC
Tennessee Workers Compensation
Supreme Court of Tennessee, Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel, Nashville
February 12, 2020
          Session: September 30, 2019           Mailed January 3, 2020          Appeal from the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims No. 2017-05-0963 Dale A. Tipps, Judge.          On August 3, 2017, Clarence Turnage ("Employee") died as a result of injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment with Dole Refrigerating Co., Inc. ("Employer"). Employee was unmarried at the time of his death, but resided with and had a child out-of-wedlock with Megan Black. It was undisputed that this child, EJT, is entitled to workers' compensation death benefits as a conclusively presumed wholly dependent child under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(a)(2). Employee had two additional children out-of-wedlock, NRT and SMT, with another woman. However, prior to his death, Employee had surrendered his parental rights to NRT and SMT, and his mother had adopted these children. NRT and SMT sought workers' compensation death benefits as either conclusively presumed wholly dependent children of Employee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(a)(2), or, alternatively, as partial dependents of Employee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(d). The Court of Workers' Compensation Claims determined that NRT and SMT are not entitled to benefits as conclusively presumed wholly dependent children or as partial dependents. The court awarded EJT benefits equal to fifty percent (50%) of Employee's average weekly wage. The court denied the motions of the guardians ad litem for EJT and for NRT and SMT for attorney's fees and deferred any fee determination until after an appeal. NRT and SMT appealed the decision of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. The appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirm the judgment. We award attorney's fees on appeal to the guardian ad litem for EJT and remand the case to the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims for a determination of the amount of such fees, together with a determination of what, if any, fees are to be awarded to the guardians ad litem for the prior proceedings in that court.          Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(a) (2014) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims Affirmed.           R. Steven Waldron, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellants, Sarah M. T. and Noah R. T.           Richard T. Mathews and R. Holland Mathews, Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellee, Elijah J. T.           Nicholas S. Akins and Connor R. Sestak, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Dole Refrigerating Co., Inc.           Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Don Ash and Robert E. Lee Da vies, Sr. JJ., joined.          OPINION           JEFFREY S. BIVINS, CHIEF JUSTICE.          Factual and Procedural Background          The parties stipulated to the following facts: On August 3, 2017, Employee died from injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment with Employer. At the time of his death, Employee was unmarried but lived with and had a child out-of-wedlock, EJT, with Megan Black. Employee had two other children born out-of-wedlock, NRT and SMT, with another woman. Prior to his death, however, Employee had surrendered his parental rights to NRT and SMT and his mother had adopted them. EJT is entitled to workers' compensation death benefits as a conclusively presumed wholly dependent child of Employee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(a)(2).          NRT and SMT sought workers' compensation death benefits as either conclusively presumed wholly dependent children of Employee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(a)(2), or, alternatively, as partial dependents of Employee under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-210(d).          Testimony of Deborah Dean          Ms. Dean is Employee's mother. Employee died on August 3, 2017. He had two children with Michelle Jewitt: NRT, born November 11, 2003; and SMT, born July 23, 2007. Employee and Ms. Jewitt were not married. According to Ms. Dean, while residing in Florida with Ms. Jewitt, NRT, and SMT, Employee got into trouble. He left the children at home alone, and Ms. Jewitt did not return home. The Florida Department of Children's Services took custody of NRT and SMT. Employee went to jail for approximately six months, and NRT and SMT were placed in separate foster homes. While Employee was in jail, Ms. Dean took custody of NRT and SMT, and they came to live with her in Tennessee. A number of years later, on December 14, 2012, Ms. Dean adopted NRT and SMT. According to Ms. Dean, after Employee was released from jail, he came to Tennessee and initially lived with her daughter. He then moved in with Ms. Black, and they subsequently had a child, EJT.          Ms. Dean described Employee's relationship with NRT and SMT following their adoption as a good and close one. They resided with her Monday through Friday, and at other times, except for some weekends, holidays, and other occasions when they would reside with Employee. If Employee did not have food, NRT and SMT would spend the weekend with Ms. Dean. In addition, they would spend summers with Employee, "[a]s long as he had the food and stuff to feed them." Ms. Dean was unable to say how many days in a year the children spent with Employee.          According to Ms. Dean, Employee worked at times during this period, but went from job to job and sometimes did not work at all. Ms. Dean testified that Employee only provided her with support for NRT and SMT at income tax time. She explained that, on a couple of occasions, he provided her a small amount of money from his tax refunds after he had claimed the two children as exemptions. She testified that she did not receive any significant amount of financial support from Employee for NRT and SMT. The last time she received money from Employee for the children was in 2016 in the amount of $900. He did not provide the children with healthcare insurance. Ms. Dean received...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT