Ewing v. Print Craft, Inc., 031219 MNWC, WC18-6197

Case DateMarch 12, 2019
CourtMinnesota
DAMON A. EWING, Employee/Respondent,
v.
PRINT CRAFT, INC. and GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVS., INC., Self-Insured Employer/Respondents
and
OPTIMAL RECOVERY, INC., Intervenor/Appellant,
and
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD MN/BLUE PLUS, NORAN NEUROLOGICAL CLINIC, ALLINA MED. CLINIC, INJURED WORKERS PHARMACY, UNITED HOSP., and ABBOTT NW. HOSP., Intervenors.
No. WC18-6197
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
March 12, 2019
         REHABILITATION - FEES AND EXPENSES. The QRC was not barred from payment for services provided under an established rehabilitation plan until the filing of the request for termination of that plan, despite the subsequent finding that the work injury was temporary and had resolved prior to that filing, under Minn. Stat. § 176.102, subd. 8; Minn. R. 5220.0510, subp. 2d; and Parker v. Univ. of Minn., 64 W.C.D. 134, 142 (W.C.C.A. 2003).           Thomas D. Atkinson, Atkinson Law Office, Arden Hills, Minnesota, for the Respondent.           Gina M. Uhrbom, Brown & Carlson, P. A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Joshua E. Borken, Law Office of Josh Borken, St Paul, Minnesota, for the Appellants.           Determined by: Gary M. Hall, Judge, David A. Stofferahn, Judge, Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge           Compensation Judge: William J. Marshall           OPINION           GARY M. HALL, Judge          Optimal Recovery appeals the compensation judge’s denial of payment for qualified rehabilitation services provided after April 20, 2016. The compensation judge did not apply the appropriate standard in determining eligibility for payment of the services at issue. We reverse the decision and award the amounts appropriate under the correct standard.          BACKGROUND          The employee, Damon Ewing, was leaving work on December 1, 2015, when he slipped on ice and injured his left ankle. The employee was provided conservative treatment. Subsequently, the employee began presenting with numerous other symptoms and conditions alleged to have been consequential injuries from the December 1, 2015, work injury including: complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), bilateral arm and shoulder pain, back pain, neck pain and spasms, right SI joint pain, insomnia, headaches, and depression. Medical treatment was provided for all of these symptoms. In April 2016, the employee was working with significant restrictions and later taken off of work due to the effects chronic pain had on the employee’s work performance.          In April 2016, the employee underwent an initial assessment for rehabilitation services from Ann Brown, QRC, of Optimal Recovery, Inc. QRC Brown concluded that the employee was qualified for rehabilitation services, as he was restricted from some work due to the effects of the December 1, 2015, work injury. In July 2016, the QRC filed an R-2 to initiate the provision of rehabilitation services. The July 2016 R-2 provided that the QRC would coordinate medical management and facilitate the employee’s treatment plan and return to work process. The self-insured employer made no objection to the R-2 at the time of filing.          On July 12, 2016, the self-insured employer filed a Notice of Insurer's Primary Liability Determination (NOPLD), accepting the employee’s December 1, 2015, work injury and agreeing to pay temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits for four days in May 2016. The QRC provided medical management services from the time of her initial consultation onward. In October 2016, the plan was amended with the QRC filing an R-3 to indicate that...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT