Fears v. Travel Nurse Across America, LLC, 042821 ARWC, H009176

Case DateApril 28, 2021
CourtKansas
AMANDA L. FEARS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT
v.
TRAVEL NURSE ACROSS AMERICA, LLC, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
And
STARR INDEMNITY INSURANCE & LIABILITY CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT
CLAIM No. H009176
Arkansas Workers Compensation
Before the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission
April 28, 2021
         Hearing before Administrative Law Judge, James D. Kennedy, on the 23rd day of March, 2021, in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.           Claimant is represented by Eddie Walker, Attorney at Law, Fort Smith, Arkansas.           Respondents are represented by James Lloyd, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.           OPINION           JAMES D. KENNEDY, Administrative Law Judge.          STATEMENT OF THE CASE          A hearing was conducted on March 23, 2021, to determine the issue of compensability of a claimed work-related injury. At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed that the sole issue before the Commission was compensability and, if the matter was found to be compensable, the claimant was entitled to temporary total disability (TTD) from November 6, 2020, until December 1, 2020, plus appropriate medical benefits and attorney fees. The parties stipulated at the time of the Pre-hearing Order that the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission has jurisdiction of the within claim; that an employer-employee relationship existed on November 5, 2020, the date of the claimed injury; and that the claimant earned sufficient wages to earn a TTD/permanent partial disability (PPD) rate of $711.00/ $533.00. A copy of the Pre-hearing Order was marked “Commission Exhibit 1” and made part of the record without objection.          The claimant’s and respondents’ responses were set out in their respective responses to the Pre-hearing Questionnaire and made a part of the record without objection. The sole witness consisted of Amanda L. Fears, the claimant. From a review of the record as a whole, to include medical reports and other matters properly before the Commission, and having had an opportunity to observe the testimony and demeanor of the witness, the following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-704.          FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW          1. The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission has jurisdiction over this claim.          2. That an employer/employee relationship existed on November 5, 2020, the date of the claimed injury. At the time of the claimed injury, the claimant earned sufficient wages to earn a TTD/PPD rate of $711.00/$533.00.          3. That the claimant has satisfied the required burden of proof to show that she sustained a compensable work-related injury on November 5, 2020.          4. That the claimant is entitled to TTD from the date of November 6, 2020, until December 1, 2020, appropriate medical benefits, and attorney fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-715. This award shall bear interest at the legal rate pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-809.          5. If not already paid, the respondents are ordered to pay for the cost of the transcript forthwith.          REVIEW OF TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE          The Pre-hearing Order, along with the Pre-hearing Questionnaires of the parties, were admitted into the record without objection. The claimant submitted one (1) exhibit that was admitted into evidence without objection and consisted of thirty-six (36) pages of medical records.          The claimant was the sole witness and testified that she was an employee of the respondent on November 5, 2020, worked as an operating room nurse performing contract work across the country, and on November 5, 2020, worked at a facility in Little Rock, Arkansas, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS). (Tr. 5) She testified that besides the operating room, which was her main job, she would go all over the hospital getting patients, lab work, and delivering pathology specimens. If she was not in the operating room, that did not mean that she was not performing her job duties. She worked twelve (12)-hour shifts and would clock in at 6:30 a.m. and work until the shift was over, which would have been at 7:00 p.m., when she would clock out, unless she was on call. (Tr. 6) She would not clock out for lunch or breaks. She was paid for the entire period of time, except for a thirty (30)-minute lunch break that she was expected to take on her own time, but that sometimes she was unable to take the break due to the fact that she was too busy. If she was unable to take a lunch break, she testified, “You grab a snack between surgeries and hope for the best. They keep peanut butter and crackers for us all the time.” (Tr. 7)          On November 5, 2020, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT