Franzen-Derrick v. Life Line Screening of AM., 010419 MNWC, WC18-6160

Case DateJanuary 04, 2019
CourtMinnesota
KRISTINA FRANZEN-DERRICK, Employee/Petitioner,
v.
LIFE LINE SCREENING OF AM. and CHUBB GROUP OF INS. CO., Employer-Insurer/Respondents.
No. WC18-6160
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
January 4, 2019
         VACATION OF AWARD - SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN CONDITION. Where the evidence is not sufficient to support an unanticipated substantial change in condition, the employee’s petition to vacate the award on stipulation is denied.           Raymond R. Peterson, McCoy Peterson, Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the Petitioner.           D. Jeffrey Pricco, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P. A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Determined by: Sean M. Quinn, Judge, David A. Stofferahn, Judge, Gary M. Hall, Judge          Petition to vacate denied.           OPINION           SEAN M. QUINN, Judge          The employee petitions to vacate an Award on Stipulation filed on October 28, 2009. Because the employee has failed to show an unanticipated substantial change in her medical condition causally related to her work injury, we decline to grant the petition.          BACKGROUND          Pre-existing medical issues          Before suffering her work injury, Kristina Franzen-Derrick, the employee, had complaints of pain in her spine, chronic pain, and issues with misuse of pain medication.          On April 9, 2004, the employee saw Dr. David Von Weiss at Park Nicollet Clinic, complaining of pain throughout the spine and potentially fibromyalgia, reported as intense pain in her back from the neck all the way down to the low back and radiating into the thigh. He prescribed anti-inflammatories and over-the-counter pain medication. On May 20, 2004, the employee saw Dr. Von Weiss for flank pain potentially due to kidney stones, fibromyalgia, and chronic low back pain. She requested additional help for pain management as antiinflammatories were not particularly helpful. She was prescribed narcotic pain medication, but was required to complete a pain contract in light of numerous prior visits at a different clinic for narcotic pain medications. Subsequent drug screening from the May 20, 2004, visit with Dr. Von Weiss was positive for marijuana, and he advised her that he would not be prescribing additional narcotic pain medication. On June 14, 2004, the employee saw Dr. Von Weiss for low back pain. Noting her history of opioid use and positive drug screening for marijuana, he refused to prescribe additional narcotic pain medication.          The work injury and surgery          On July 24, 2004, the employee suffered an admitted injury working for Life Line Screening of America, the employer. While lifting ultrasound equipment into a van, she felt neck pain. The pain did not subside. On August 31, 2004, the employee underwent a C6 corpectomy, a C5-6 discectomy on the right, and a discectomy on the left side at C6-7, performed by Dr. Jeffrey Dick.          Post-injury medical care and other injuries          On November 23, 2004, the employee saw Tricia Wallentine, P.A., at Park Nicollet for, among other things, depression. She was encouraged to continue with anti-depression medications and to stop smoking. On March 27, 2005, the employee was seen at Fairview Ridges Hospital with low back pain after lifting a suitcase off a baggage claim at the airport. On April 17, 2005, the employee saw Dr. Larik Woronzoff-Dashkoff at Park Nicollet with complaints of low back pain which had become worse over the past few days, and concerns about an upcoming airline trip. She was prescribed narcotic pain medication.          On December 8, 2004, Dr. Paul Cederberg completed a report after examining the employee at the request of the employer and insurer. He diagnosed the employee with an extruded disc at C5-6 with a history of preexisting degenerative disc disease at C5-6 and C6-7, as well as a history of fibromyalgia. He opined that the surgery at C5-6 and at C6-7 was reasonable and necessary, and that the herniation for which she needed surgery at the C5-6 level was caused or aggravated by the 2004 work injury.          On August 3, 2005, the employee saw Dr. Joseph Perra, who suggested an implantable stimulator. Dr. Perra believed that if it was not successful, perhaps surgical fusion would be appropriate. He also encouraged smoking cessation. The employee wanted to go ahead with fusion surgery, but Dr. Perra encouraged the stimulator first.          In December 2005, the employee underwent surgery performed by Dr. Perra, which included a C5-7 cervical fusion and a right C7 hemi-laminectomy, and a few days later, the removal of the right C7 screw. During her hospital stay, the employee was evaluated by Dr. Matthew Monsein, who assessed chronic pain syndrome and opiate tolerance. He noted her high tolerance for narcotics and ordered an even higher dosage of medication.          On May 3, 2006, the employee underwent a CT scan of the cervical spine, which showed a solid fusion from C5-7. On June 29, 2006, the employee reported to Dr. John Clark at Park Nicollet with complaints of acute back pain for two and a half weeks with no specific injury. The employee was prescribed narcotic pain medication. On July 7, 2006, the employee had an EMG and nerve conduction study done at Noran Neurological. The results were normal. On July 18, 2006, Dr. John Decker of Apple Valley Medical Clinic diagnosed the employee with chronic pain syndrome and depression due to her condition. He recommended additional anti-depressants. On July 25, 2006, the employee underwent an MRI of the neck, which showed a minor disc bulge at the C4-5 level, with a solid fusion from C5-7. On July 26, 2006, the employee was seen at Noran Neurological for her persistent neck pain and constant occipital headaches. Testing showed no significant issue. The doctor noted the employee was disappointed nothing was found to be objectively wrong with her. He felt she needed a comprehensive pain clinic. On August 10, 2006, the employee reported to Dr. Ann Strong at Park Nicollet with worsening low back pain. She was prescribed narcotic pain medications.          Dr. Cederberg completed a second report on October 3, 2006, after re-examining the employee at the request of the employer and insurer. He diagnosed the employee with disc herniation at C5-6 and a history of C5-7 fusion with pseudoarthrosis. He opined that her fusion at C5-6 was due to the July 2004 work injury but the fusion at C6-7 was due to pre-existing degeneration of the neck. He stated that treatment with anti-depressant medication appeared to be reasonable, although he had no opinion as to whether depression was related to her neck injury, and that a chronic pain program was not needed as she was under reasonable control with Vicodin and Cymbalta. He also indicated the employee had reached maximum medical improvement (MMI), had a 17 percent permanent partial disability rating for her neck, and could work at the light-sedentary level with no use of her arms overhead, no holding her neck in a static position for more than 15 minutes, and no lifting more than 20 pounds. The employer and insurer paid the employee for the 17 percent rating.          On October 25, 2006, the employee saw Dr. Perra for a chronic pain consultation. She was said to have suffered headaches of unknown etiology, was status post two-level fusion, was not experiencing a significant amount of neck pain, had a history of hand and finger color changes of uncertain etiology, and had increased depression.          On November 20, 2006, Dr. Thomas Gratzer issued a report after examining the employee at the request of the employer and insurer. Dr. Gratzer diagnosed the employee with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood and related the adjustment disorder to her July 2004 work injury. He also found she had reached MMI relative to her adjustment disorder and needed no additional medical care. He placed no limitations on her from a psychiatric perspective. As part of that examination with Dr. Gratzer, the employee took an MMPI test with Dr. Marvin Logel. Dr. Logel interpreted the MMPI test as suggesting somatoform disorder and personality disorder with dependent features. He went on to state that the employee might also have a depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and a psychophysiological gastrointestinal disorder.          On December 22, 2006, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT