Garthus v. Benedictine Health Ctr., 052099 MNWC,

Case DateMay 20, 1999
CourtMinnesota
AMY L. GARTHUS, Employee,
v.
BENEDICTINE HEALTH CTR., SELF-IN­SURED, adm'd by BERKLEY ADM'RS, Employer/Petitioner,
and
SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
May 20, 1999
         HEADNOTES          VACATION OF AWARD - MISTAKE. The petitioner, the self-insured employer, failed to establish a mutual mistake of fact at the time of settlement sufficient to vacate the stipulation for settlement.          VACATION OF AWARD - FRAUD; VACATION OF AWARD - SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN CONDITION. The petitioner's claims of fraud in the inducement or, in the alternative, of a substantial change in condition since the settlement, are referred to a compensation judge at the Office of Administrative Hearings for a hearing and factual findings.           Petition to vacate referred for hearing at OAH.           Determined by Johnson, J., Wilson, J., and Wheeler, C.J.           OPINION          FACTUAL BACKGROUND          Amy L. Garthus, the employee, sustained an admitted personal injury to her neck and low back on April 24, 1989, while working for the employer, Benedictine Health Center. The employer was self-insured for worker's compensation purposes at all relevant times. The employee began treating with Dr. William Fleesen in April 1989. Dr. Fleesen referred the employee to Dr. Richard Freeman, a neurosurgeon, who performed a cervical discectomy and fusion at C4-5 and  C5-6 on July 18, 1989. The employee returned to work for the employer in a modified job in February 1990.          The employee contended she sustained a second injury to her neck and low back on October 24, 1990. The employer denied liability for this injury. The employee filed a claim petition seeking wage loss and permanent partial disability benefits resulting from both injuries. In a findings and order filed March 4, 1992, a compensation judge found the employee sustained a work-related injury to her neck and low back on October 24, 1990. The judge further found the employee sustained a 16.5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole as a result of the injuries to her cervical spine and a 10.5% whole body disability secondary to the lumbar spine injuries.1 The judge assigned 90% of the employee's disability to the April 24, 1989 injury and attributed 10% to the October 24, 1990 injury.[2] (Findings and Order, March 4, 1992.)          The employee returned to see Dr. Fleesen on July 23, 1992, reporting no improvement since the fusion surgery. She complained of headaches, neck pain radiating into her left arm and low back pain. Dr. Fleesen reviewed MRI and CT scans and plain x-rays and concluded the studies demonstrated a solid fusion at C5-6, a fusion breakdown at C4-5 with the development of a pseudoarthrosis, and a possible C6-7 disc herniation. The doctor referred the employee to Dr. Timothy Garvey for evaluation for a possible refusion and/or intervention at C6-7. (Pet. Ex. 11-14.)          The employee saw Dr. Garvey on September 10, 1992. Following a cervical discography, Dr. Garvey recommended a C4-5 fusion to correct the pseudarthrosis. Dr. Garvey opined there was a 50/50 chance the surgery would relieve the employee's pain. On December 9, 1992, Dr. Garvey performed a posterior cervical fusion from C4 to C6 with internal fixation and an iliac crest bone graft. Thereafter, Dr. Garvey recommended the employee follow up with Dr. Fleesen and hoped the employee could return to light-duty work. (Pet. Ex. 11-15.)          The employee was off work from October 24, 1990 until September 1993 when she returned to a modified job with the employer. The employee worked for about one week. She then remained off work and was paid temporary total disability benefits by the employer.  On October 19, 1993, Dr. Fleesen stated he had nothing further to offer the employee from a treatment standpoint. The doctor concluded the employee was not a candidate for further surgery, physical therapy or psychotherapy, although some short-term counseling might be helpful. Dr. Fleesen concluded the employee was permanently and totally disabled. He opined the employee was able to spend only two to four hours a day devoted to family or employment activities and had to lie down and rest to treat her pain and headaches during the rest of the day. Dr. Fleesen noted the employee told him "she cannot tolerate even a couple of hours of lightest work, and I take this at face value - - at this point in this case, with this patient." Finally, Dr. Fleesen concluded there was only a small likelihood a pain management program would increase the employee's tolerance for the activities of daily living. (Pet. Ex. 11-14.)          The employee was seen by Dr. Fleeson on January 31, 1994, essentially without change. On February 1, 1995, Dr. Fleesen again examined the employee who complained of increased upper back and neck pain over the past month. On examination, the doctor noted extreme limitation of cervical motion with normal reflexes. The diagnosis was multiple cervical spine fusions with a residual unoperated C6-7 disc protrusion. The doctor believed the increased pain was possibly due to problems with the fusion or increased disc degeneration.          The employee had filed a claim petition, on September 23, 1993, seeking permanent total disability benefits from and after December 9, 1992, additional permanent partial disability and rehabilitation benefits. In March 1995, the parties entered into a stipulation for settlement. The employee contended she was permanently and totally disabled and alleged entitlement to additional permanent partial disability benefits, rehabilitation benefits and medical expenses. The self-insured employer denied the employee was permanently and totally disabled and relied upon the independent medical evaluation of Dr. Robert H.N. Fielden, dated December 3, 1993.3 To settle their claims, the parties stipulated the employee became permanently and totally disabled on October 24, 1990. The parties acknowledged the employee was receiving Social Security Disability benefits and agreed the employer and insurer would be entitled to the offset provisions of Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4. The parties agreed the self-insured employer would "pay ongoing permanent total disability...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT